Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 27 November 2017 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: isis-wg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A5F127419; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:32:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJEQSIwUVavp; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3132127005; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:32:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14083; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1511825570; x=1513035170; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=hRLq72OM3zkYEweMEde/C2hWMihz7o3uLuIjedUf0R0=; b=nJLQ2sVS7/pgOc08OHiadyEwkzc+VIKe7j0KO9fOs6llhFox4DO+V8KW Wac0paLolOUbq1SHcDF56tM9xBZ0vspc0PfiKWs2CVRUORTnUMIXg/niV RwbzxW1kgWaZ0C3aNgNeMf1ETlzpnwnDCli7j4VkWsdAqDECrnsb+9mp0 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0C2AACDnxxa/4gNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYJKcmZuFBMHg3iKII8TgX2RJIVJghEKGAEKhRgCGoRaPxgBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQFrKIUfAQEBBAEBGwZLCxACAQgRAwECKAMCAgIlCxQJCAIEDgWJPmQQp?= =?us-ascii?q?wWCJ4p6AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDOoIHhmmFPBaCX4JjBZF2hzC?= =?us-ascii?q?JIAKHcI0aghaGDIssjHaJFwIRGQGBOQEfOSaBKm8VOYIphFV3iReBFAEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,466,1505779200"; d="scan'208,217";a="325676183"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 27 Nov 2017 23:32:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vARNWn4D010636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:32:49 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:32:48 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:32:48 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
CC: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "isis-wg@ietf.org" <isis-wg@ietf.org>, "isis-ads@ietf.org" <isis-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
Thread-Index: AQHTXmMuMOokR1pbPUaPu1E7vkG+66MkNH4AgATyvID//8wGgA==
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:32:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D6420A98.DBA49%acee@cisco.com>
References: <87375fp3hv.fsf@chopps.org> <D63E0C77.DB3C2%acee@cisco.com> <487DD301-14A0-4DE6-9AD2-367A4B9B0402@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <487DD301-14A0-4DE6-9AD2-367A4B9B0402@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.198]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D6420A98DBA49aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Ykzi_8QbnvtULFfaDxQ0kKmqlmY>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07
X-BeenThere: isis-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IS-IS working group <isis-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/isis-wg/>
List-Post: <mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg>, <mailto:isis-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:32:53 -0000

Hi Naiming,

From: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com<mailto:naiming@cisco.com>>
Date: Monday, November 27, 2017 at 4:38 PM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org<mailto:chopps@chopps.org>>, "isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>" <isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:isis-wg@ietf.org>>, "isis-ads@ietf.org<mailto:isis-ads@ietf.org>" <isis-ads@ietf.org<mailto:isis-ads@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric-07


Hi Acee,

thanks for the comments. replies inline with <NS>…</NS>

On Nov 24, 2017, at 3:05 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

Hi,

I support publication of the subject document. I do have comments.

  1. Why do you call the reverse-metricn field, “Metric Offset”? This
sounds like a remnant of some bad 20th century CLI….

<NS>
the draft used to have the field as just ‘Metric’, since version 06, we responded
to the comments:


Section 2

From the description what is being advertised in the new TLV is not a metric but a metric offset i.e. you want the receiving IS to add the advertised value to its existing configured metric. Identifying the metric field as "metric offset" would make this point more clearly.


which is a good point I think. do you think there is an alternative name we
can use in replacing the ‘offset’ here?
</NS>

How about just calling it the “Reverse Metric”?

Thanks,
Acee



  2. Please split the single sentence description immediately following
figure 1 into multiple sentences. Maybe just refer to “Elements of
Procedure” sections rather than one incomprehensible sentence.
  3. Pervasive editorial comment, the plural of acronyms is does NOT have
an apostrophe. For example, it is TLVs, not TLV’s.

<NS>
will change those.

thanks.
- Naiming
</NS>


Thanks,
Acee


On 11/15/17, 5:43 PM, "Isis-wg on behalf of Christian Hopps"
<isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:isis-wg-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of chopps@chopps.org<mailto:chopps@chopps.org>> wrote:


The authors have asked for and we are starting a WG Last Call on

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-reverse-metric/

which will last an extended 3 weeks to allow for IETF100.

Thanks,
Chris.

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:Isis-wg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg

_______________________________________________
Isis-wg mailing list
Isis-wg@ietf.org<mailto:Isis-wg@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/isis-wg