Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 19 February 2013 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FD021F89AE for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WuBZscR5SjFa for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-f177.google.com (mail-ve0-f177.google.com [209.85.128.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C4721F89A3 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m1so6355072ves.36 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=5gTSDoYC9hsAEblVKJwx0sn0dhwUOGMr70JbOXTyHGY=; b=dkJhpWJa97FAOqfrlYOmMWo6OPXQJiLEtxINVST9chpa7SIAht4o+sObehVwThORIg O6VCPOh4/jSd9Wc1clDzgLS+76D8l8goUistVoOyynvzkdVLFRxjn4ZZTcCULzRbd3QC j2bDOWfzvc9/JWjBfu/rz2d9zulJjaDczMRRfoMiQJS47Mq9Joc7/RIQNUTdDwdI6EMO MzvGAoksNFflxtlRXOX24tQCsijEWDzNQzpR3R/h3aBdYW1ffQC5k95co4IdHJWSjCn3 n1c6iKmS+7zFR1hk6mYIbWfuWhb6K1TRGF9byS3SmMKUkq+c13U0PQhKstX3BjLVNDq3 fosw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.73.73 with SMTP id j9mr19876964vdv.124.1361313641353; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.164.74 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [172.29.161.33]
In-Reply-To: <CALcybBDX+tZnndDAOuXChEWURGcxMdAD6d10Kh0qf4LM0kN+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHBU6is92fgYKE-mvcUNmN--h2KYkwMJvNGgDCYJ_pt4+xynZQ@mail.gmail.com> <A723FC6ECC552A4D8C8249D9E07425A70F897E94@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <CALcybBDX+tZnndDAOuXChEWURGcxMdAD6d10Kh0qf4LM0kN+CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:40:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iuMZzEev0bcB12iCoUVEfaS9jZ64-Yr0RpbOH0c=NhLfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec501c5bc0551c504d61b8813"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmKqs67WA48OgqU4Aie4WNmBm5f6ugWtkboQlJSgJqYCGlUqqIKBmTnbUtwF9UusWcDJUe
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] [apps-discuss] JSON mailing list and BoF
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion related to JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\)." <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:40:43 -0000

JSON, unlike XML, does not exclude U+0000


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Francis Galiegue <fgaliegue@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
> <jhildebr@cisco.com> wrote:
> > \u0000 is an exception.
> >
>
> Why? It is a perfectly legal Unicode code point...
>
> --
> Francis Galiegue, fgaliegue@gmail.com
> Try out your JSON Schemas: http://json-schema-validator.herokuapp.com
>