Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality

Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <sgbeal@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7C421F946C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.323, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 363cFRJKcINL for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB9821F9FD7 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c10so858270wiw.11 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mA7/pvVHZzdMOxjcYXcy2g7Yj95ZFV+7X19Hj91+Ha4=; b=hzY+U0VLiMvurp5IMg3SIKTbYjLfk/Sok8DrKQXMmZSkx07VS/fkZVYeVK20ouVExh +qwpBHGsNLnxXXOgWyhmsxoRbNqhWa/HHSE8BUMnMneGuoNKiIvdIkGYQkjfM9l8smDJ zSkoEamPP9e2WtGAroiXs9eGY/am6px8+9PJL3dvPGKnzSrooDLm5jCxW8Zl3yKANiFk egD+85H8OxLZL2MYwuw1yqCtzVY+4PLi2CMvDSakTq+3BkNoT6cPSmwsM2Y4lp5wJ2/X peSMFXJ8ycD/h9/z4VuHxEtzPvuebsfNjR8ls3drG3VNVCslC4BoW0kQ2uEYSNC7cLNT cwtA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.75.201 with SMTP id e9mr9698441wjw.20.1371835268241; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.42.230 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iv7SY4qB64O2mK+XDsUDuALiRP6GMjHe1KqSNus6cCo+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <DB211AD8-6BBA-4D95-9B6E-F00AA69E584E@vpnc.org> <CAHBU6iv7SY4qB64O2mK+XDsUDuALiRP6GMjHe1KqSNus6cCo+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 19:21:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKd4nAgrxpbDtvSwL2PhZ4Lzewgsj6vCijxiYB4Hz0kyfOBEwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephan Beal <sgbeal@googlemail.com>
To: "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bb04efcdadb3004dfad498d"
Subject: Re: [Json] Consensus call: establishing name equality
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 17:21:17 -0000

On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> wrote:

> #1 and #3 only differ at the editorial-nit level; I’m equally fine with
> either.  -T
>

+1

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal