Re: [KAML] Re: Chicago bar-BOF summary

"Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov> Thu, 13 September 2007 21:24 UTC

Return-path: <kaml-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVwAW-0003gh-0n; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:24:12 -0400
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVwAU-0003gU-HC for kaml@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:24:10 -0400
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov ([130.202.113.50]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVwAT-0004mg-W9 for kaml@ietf.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:24:10 -0400
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.ctd.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A54B48; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:24:09 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (atalanta.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.104]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A195C; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:24:09 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <46E9AA7B.4040508@anl.gov>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:24:11 -0500
From: "Douglas E. Engert" <deengert@anl.gov>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gerald Beuchelt <beuchelt@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [KAML] Re: Chicago bar-BOF summary
References: <46DE5CC1.10204@it.su.se> <8158D751-0EE0-4D58-81DB-549C4A413B68@jpl.nasa.gov> <9B9324ACE4CA354EAF122E7D0E0673B64BDF23@NDMSEVS22.ndc.nasa.gov> <D80F0FFA-D9FF-48F1-B410-75078B40E8D7@jpl.nasa.gov> <46E1A274.1080600@anl.gov> <D208EBD0-1182-49C6-9A6F-B3210C4627E5@jpl.nasa.gov> <46E79162.2010402@it.su.se> <C5437591-6811-4087-9C89-D7959A6872D4@jpl.nasa.gov> <46E9905E.3040404@sun.com> <370D0C3F-8DBD-4FCD-82EA-D6155EB06F41@jpl.nasa.gov> <46E9A3DB.4040608@sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <46E9A3DB.4040608@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 34d35111647d654d033d58d318c0d21a
Cc: kaml@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: kaml@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about SAML and Kerberos intersections <kaml.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/kaml>
List-Post: <mailto:kaml@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml>, <mailto:kaml-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: kaml-bounces@ietf.org


Gerald Beuchelt wrote:
> It is my understanding (and I am also no lawyer!) that the article by 
> John Brezak carries a patent license regarding the actual content of the 
> document itself.
> 
> Now, this document specifies the PAC for Windows 2000, with the 
> exception of 18 reserved fields. What it also does not specify is any 
> PAC changes in XP, 2003, Vista, or 2008. It also does not specify any 
> backend infrastructure (e.g. discovery or resolution services, policy 
> tools, or data storage, etc.) that might or might not be covered by 
> patents or other intellectual property rights. Also, some of the default 
> SIDs in the Windows implementation that are required for evaluating 
> group membership (e.g. EVERYONE, etc.) are also not included in this 
> document.
> 

There was also the IETF:
draft-brezak-win2k-krb-authz-01.txt
from October 2002, I still have a copy, but does not address XP, 2003
or Vista.

Samba has been working on using the PAC created by Windows, and trying
to get XP to use a Samba/Heimdal created PAC. So they may have addressed
a lot of these issues.

http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/trunk-cluster/source/libads/authdata.c
referes to KERB_VALIDATION_INFO



> In addition, I do seem to remember that Microsoft at some time offered a 
> complete description (purportedly including the 18 reserved fields) of 
> the PAC that came with a license explicitly prohibiting implementation. 
> Since I did not touch this document, I cannot speak to its actual content.
> So, as I am not a lawyer, I am quite paranoid when it comes to other 
> people's IPR and license terms. Therefore I am just cautioning the use 
> of these specifications, since they are (i) old (Windows 2000), (ii) not 
> peer-reviewed, and (iii) not published by an established standards 
> organization with a clear IPR regime.
> 
> Sorry to be such a pain, but if the majority of this group is intend on 
> pursuing the NT PAC path, I would suggest that someone approaches 
> Microsoft to get clarification about the status of the spec.
> 

I don't think trying to add something to the Microsoft PAC is a good idea.
But if they add something "Level of assurance" to the PAC using it is
another story.

Adding another auth_data element of SAML does not require the Microsoft PAC.


> Best,
> 
> Gerald
> 
> 
> Henry B. Hotz wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Gerald Beuchelt wrote:
>>
>>> However, note that there is no patent covenant or even simple 
>>> licensing terms for the backend infrastructure, so while implementing 
>>> these data structures might be covered *to the extend that they are 
>>> documented here), the necessary backend infrastructure might require 
>>> additional licensing and royalties.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean.  Can you give an example of something that 
>> might require a license?  In my mind (I'm not a lawyer) an 
>> implementation is either independent, or not.  Since Microsoft doesn't 
>> publish actual code for any of this an implementation is either 
>> pirated from unpublished code, or it's independent, isn't it?
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The opinions expressed in this message are mine,
>> not those of Caltech, JPL, NASA, or the US Government.
>> Henry.B.Hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
>>
>>
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> KAML mailing list
> KAML@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <DEEngert@anl.gov>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444

_______________________________________________
KAML mailing list
KAML@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kaml