IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-07.txt

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Wed, 03 March 2021 22:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93153A1C8D for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:37:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net header.b=AYtXwUxi; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=dwj60kXj
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RWsdGwVsZawU for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:37:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D61733A1C8B for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:37:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4BD1966; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 17:37:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 03 Mar 2021 17:37:41 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbiw.net; h= subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=O MBUN2GCfOlI8KDryPVNWZcDSiWTNQi9Vdx5qi5r5Qs=; b=AYtXwUxi7JMUfoQ/C ZTlgkczqYzynRGm8yTCcVGwDjWXbSggNLyukKeG3jTnaiDfwihRbobvP8HcKr5BF mdUQDD1gqjTEt8CQESF2VIpOJ8Zf2Epiaajqvjb+1nWNuDmVchZNjm0dw+nl5Uga jPpIFpZ2rwV+7GrB7AdVVdPAm+0LwkJWuT2pk9zE5HzQ4v6BWvPr2XLYU/oQmkb7 Fns8u1Eban061Hf8uQMMpKAQf6ty9aXrdYXhXCKQ3zUzm8JoWRDmuBB/diS8wbtW bFojF4UqVDkiJ5xxoRb82051AOOC2X8y9phyu9bsDlRjc4HMhswdGmyM+RmtvezA SWsWA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=OMBUN2GCfOlI8KDryPVNWZcDSiWTNQi9Vdx5qi5r5 Qs=; b=dwj60kXjDn7p4kjSAREAkE5UVqucNua+EBUdoAoLZpLtIrY/oVGTZgOnv 2hgb/jxlFhUivw+yaWaNuhyebWQmYRtV+w1EMnffxYlOsQ6Tih45fwyuaiWB8akQ FVOTN7V71nhGJQF+u+C190zj2fUbOTjp4wbp0f8FZy92y4rzgblHTT8BKW1EupKf TS/ULfGBGbSai3y8otgGWSx5DMnNDWd7f7RMvLLE4we1e83VE/x+OkeLbB2paU5b oTNb10J46oJGsHE02JOfm64SzvNZT9TPBAre5UTostOUuRSoKtcBLx2JcIw3Cl4f U/Ggo+fAFt38S/jlua2Su/fgTkjfA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tA9AYGVvufj3OlWe3iRTgwmJNDvkc0K_0bE6R4EClwM3qhbMSynX7w> <xme:tA9AYInLuKDeggLnjZgCJtjNl7EjUm052v_07PCUZvqcduGbZOPFBB5ZdSrwA5vWP rH9Fk_Ht8byVL9dHQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddtfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurf hrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefuvfhfhfhokffffgggjggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucev rhhotghkvghruceouggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepiefhvdeugfejkefftdfhleevleetveefgeetfeegteejjedujeeugeehfeehgfei necuffhomhgrihhnpegssghifidrnhgvthenucfkphepuddtkedrvddviedrudeivddrie efnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggt rhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tA9AYIC1IBoU2d9dw492nooichyFbFAR0I3dGRj9ZUH1Nj7YaPKxIw> <xmx:tA9AYIeQ2PwVjp2NowqupR7oEVwwsXoPhi-BpokbiXwyEF_wYWYzZA> <xmx:tA9AYDJRSXKAk2vS7D4LFnR4LXMpaMx5N_TsrQ2J3Rd120TVP6S5gg> <xmx:tA9AYA4DtzLWag6NIMDdDJMMej2EJ7TMwG-JDRW_HTwOCiIo9RzxMA>
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A2E62240064; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 17:37:39 -0500 (EST)
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
References: <20210227000746.583206EF7036@ary.qy> <1bf0f5b1-a7a8-8c9f-3d6a-6f29f57fdb37@bbiw.net> <aaa9869-a44f-d23c-a5d-4f9e9d6d6c75@taugh.com> <688c9a89-1d37-deb9-9a93-2a69f1a63f28@bbiw.net> <2da68d7e-5f5f-b4bd-3d14-e5be523b5de@taugh.com> <01RW5O4GZD6A005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <7ac7fc9d-2b20-7e9b-c967-d1ce7cea7a46@bbiw.net> <8389429589bcf06937686653595fd2e011205888.camel@ifi.uio.no> <01RW712B6XMY005PTU@mauve.mrochek.com> <2417047a-936a-2c8b-74b3-d6ef40937fe7@bbiw.net> <0E6959004B28EA07186F2426@LM73.int.jck.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <8af20513-0afa-0da3-adac-e1b3c511a0ed@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 14:37:38 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0E6959004B28EA07186F2426@LM73.int.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/P3FuNHhiU5jURqOil9BegOgImlo>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-07.txt
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 22:37:50 -0000

On 3/3/2021 1:28 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
> --On Wednesday, 03 March, 2021 11:06 -0800 Dave Crocker
> <dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote:
>> Defining a normative core is typically Very Good practice for
>> a protocol, to ensure basic interoperability.
>>
>> At this stage, however, I think we do not know enough about
>> the way this will get used to be able to assign normative
>> status to a core set of emojis.  "Basic interoperability" here
>> has more to do with humans than computers.
>>
>> If the Experiment produces clear guidance we can easily
>> incorporate it to make give normative status to support for a
>> core set of emojis.
> 
> I agree but, if you expect the Experiment to possibly produce
> clear guidance about what, if anything, should be in a
> normative, possibly minimum, set of emoji to be supported,
> should not one of the questions be "If you know and it seem
> important, what emoji are you supporting and which ones are your
> users actually using?" or something like that?


cf my recent posting about false precision.

d/


-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email