Re: [ldapext] LDAP work at IETF...

Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> Sun, 25 January 2015 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@stroeder.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200491A006B for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DtFjiJcsanYd for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv1.stroeder.com (srv1.stroeder.com [213.240.180.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C871A005D for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv4.stroeder.local (srv4.stroeder.local [10.1.1.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.stroeder.local", Issuer "stroeder.com Server CA no. 2009-07" (not verified)) by srv1.stroeder.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A2E1D780; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:07:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by srv4.stroeder.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC381DF9C; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:07:05 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at stroeder.local
Received: from srv4.stroeder.local ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv4.stroeder.local [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BfTohzNMcZqV; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:06:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from nb2.stroeder.local (nb2.stroeder.local [10.1.1.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by srv4.stroeder.local (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9C81CE25; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:06:57 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54C56900.8010105@stroeder.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:06:56 +0100
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.32
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Clément OUDOT <clem.oudot@gmail.com>
References: <etPan.54c553b0.19e21bb2.1f2@lpm.local> <CAPcb_GJpf=KGYbfhfyU92Ea3Dvvvw_hb08z0US75SzUCd9iukQ@mail.gmail.com> <54C55A27.8020903@stroeder.com> <CAK_oV4_pJUZrrgaA0RzkJPGVPNG+EtYS0aQe-RRbJfbyA7dG+A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK_oV4_pJUZrrgaA0RzkJPGVPNG+EtYS0aQe-RRbJfbyA7dG+A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms070105020404070904030009"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/RuOvFsK9fuJmlggUyp2_lKeClcc>
Cc: LDAP Extensions list <ldapext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] LDAP work at IETF...
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 22:07:15 -0000

Clément OUDOT wrote:
> 2015-01-25 22:03 GMT+01:00 Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>:
>> Gavin Henry wrote:
>>>> I would also like to hear about volunteers to work on those documents, either contributing text or reviewing them carefully.
>>>
>>> I would like to help where I can.
>>
>> Glad to here that. Do you have any particular interest.
>>
>> Everybody can start reviewing existing stuff.  Which could also mean that you
>> simply ask questions if something is not clear enough.
>>
>> For inetOrgPerson 2.0 it would help if we collect a wish list and then compile
>> a realistic requirement list from that.
> 
> I am also volunteer to help, especially on the password policy draft.

Would you be willing to act as an editor?

If yes, then simply start a new e-mail thread.

A good start would be to agree on a goal.

IMHO we should try to mainly document current state of implementations of
draft-behera-ldap-password-policy, but also have a closer look on Appendix A
of http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zeilenga-ldap-passwords-00

Digging the list archives could also help here.

Ciao, Michael.