Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: collection

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Sun, 07 August 2011 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A3521F85DA for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.252, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AGwHUSEU9sYG for <link-relations@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:05:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96B121F85C7 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so803551fxe.31 for <link-relations@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q1WsvHnxnl2B3Obj9A8zv66e4hTYEscsDDaaznC2cG4=; b=tl6OQ4/Gm9UvfVlNMwjhHMcdK5oCQ1oVBP/0Rp0ubAwdW5dP9x9qyAS7xLaFglInzY ymwRZNuQM65KgnfwDHPPT1SX9oNL/S1Wp3kUlrp+a9WJEEe89jjlnQNsvTu+tsUpNZtb FImv40n8WwQ1DW4DCm/a+NfPxg1y5Los4VW9Y=
Received: by 10.223.29.145 with SMTP id q17mr5357572fac.118.1312689973114; Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:06:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.224]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d5sm3136472fak.40.2011.08.06.21.06.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 06 Aug 2011 21:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E3E0F5A.8010101@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 07:06:50 +0300
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: link-relations@ietf.org
References: <CAPW_8m676cCQEHN=_XE_E4k_7zF=MBNE7O6Cvy1+BLwp9fG8MA@mail.gmail.com> <4E3CF493.9010007@gmx.de> <CAPW_8m44aMqgFJ7nf3trD=r_LTNPYnQjGp31YMfrGGeX1bqC=A@mail.gmail.com> <4E3CFA65.3090300@gmx.de> <CAPW_8m5AyZsxSg2FBsNCQ7WyyS0ghZpQZ0jeAc=yQ92=qmH-jw@mail.gmail.com> <4E3CFE8A.1070103@gmail.com> <CAPW_8m4M0S0BS37OPCkCD1BPUwL7gMYM7jP5qxr3B=vnxW7HVg@mail.gmail.com> <4E3D0C54.7070209@gmx.de> <CABzDd=4be+7aQ65aH1Msgusn0RTcqGnfQrUdH1X160cgL0eQMg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPW_8m5yQEMO0Mw7=6b1vaLdUqSWKNEq6VG6THJ6YWorEqYOZw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPW_8m5yQEMO0Mw7=6b1vaLdUqSWKNEq6VG6THJ6YWorEqYOZw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: collection
X-BeenThere: link-relations@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <link-relations.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/link-relations>
List-Post: <mailto:link-relations@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations>, <mailto:link-relations-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 04:05:52 -0000

Hi Mike,

I think this draft is almost ready for uploading it to IETF repository.  
I'd like you made several changes/improvements - see below.

In introduction, please include general statement on what is link 
relations.  I propose "RFC 5988 [RFC5988] defined the way of indicating 
resources on the Web.  This document specifies two new reciprocal types 
of such relation..."

Do you need Section 2?  You don't use RFC 219 keywords in the document.

With respect to Security considerations.  I think you should just point 
to RFC 5988, which says everything you need; you new rel types don't add 
anything to security issues of RFC 5988.

Should your draft refer to those documents you pointed to before (I mean 
OpenSearch, and two media types definitions).  You may note in 
Introduction or create a separate Appendix that several known usages exist.

Thanks,
Mykyta Yevstifeyev

07.08.2011 5:09, mike amundsen wrote:
> I've posted a "pre-draft" version of the I-D here:
> http://amundsen.com/media-types/files/item-and-collection/
>
> I would appreciate any advice, pointers, suggestions on improving this
> before I post the first submission to the IETF.
>
> I am currently at a loss as to what to include for the Security
> Considerations section. I've posted some suggestions/questions within
> this draft; feel free to point me in the proper direction.
>
> As soon as I clean up this version, I'll post it to the tracker
> (another first for me<g>).
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> mca
> http://amundsen.com/blog/
> http://twitter.com@mamund
> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>
>
> #RESTFest 2011 - Aug 18-20
> http://restfest.org
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 09:58, Ed Summers<ehs@pobox.com>  wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> +1 for your efforts on registering 'collection'. We have a need for a
>> <link rel='collection' ...>  that could be used in HTML at MPOW.
>>
>> //Ed
>> _______________________________________________
>> link-relations mailing list
>> link-relations@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations
>>
> _______________________________________________
> link-relations mailing list
> link-relations@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/link-relations
>