Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: collection

[mike amundsen <[e-mail]>]

Mykyta:

Ok, will do.

One procedural Q. I will be submitting both the TXT and the XML file.
I assume the file names should be:
draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-00.txt
draft-amundsen-item-and-collection-link-relations-00.xml

IOW, i supply the "00" and i supply the file extension.

thanks.

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me


#RESTFest 2011 - Aug 18-20
http://restfest.org



On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 23:39, Mykyta Yevstifeyev <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Mike,
>
> Please upload this draft with <https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/> to
> allow further comments.
>
> Mykyta
>
> 10.08.2011 6:21, mike amundsen wrote:
>>
>> I've updated my pre-draft I-D for 'collection' and 'item' Link Relation
>> Types:
>> http://amundsen.com/media-types/files/item-and-collection/
>>
>> per suggestions from Mykyta&  Julian:
>> - added opening sentence in Abstract and Introduction that refers to
>> RFC5988
>> - added a reference to the existing media types (OpenSearch, Maze+XML,
>> and Collection+JSON) in the Introduction
>> - dropped the 2119 section
>> - removed the JSON examples and replaced them w/ Link Header examples;
>> cleaned up the examples a bit, too.
>> - modified Security and I18N w/ references to appropriate sections in 5988
>> - modified the IANA Considerations section "Reference" item per Julian
>> (is this what you meant?)
>>
>> Julian:
>> regarding the existing "up" link-rel-type and the proposed
>> "collection" link-rel-type...
>> I note the def for "up" (in 5988) refers to a "hierarchy" which I mean
>> to avoid in the case of "collection." IOW, i think "collection" can be
>> used not only for navigating hierarchies (if that is what is needed),
>> but also to navigate filtered sets or groups that are not in a
>> hierarchy.
>>
>> Thanks again for the feedback. I look forward to additional remarks.
>>
>> mca
>> http://amundsen.com/blog/
>> http://twitter.com@mamund
>> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>>
>>
>> #RESTFest 2011 - Aug 18-20
>> http://restfest.org
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 09:32, Julian Reschke<[e-mail]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2011-08-07 04:09, mike amundsen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've posted a "pre-draft" version of the I-D here:
>>>> http://amundsen.com/media-types/files/item-and-collection/
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate any advice, pointers, suggestions on improving this
>>>> before I post the first submission to the IETF.
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> OK. Looks good so far.
>>>
>>> A general question: what's the relation between "up" and "collection"? Do
>>> you see "up" as a special case in that it mentions document hierarchies?
>>>
>>> Editorial:
>>>
>>> - as Mykyta noted: no need for Section 2 if you don't need the keywords
>>>
>>> - the examples use a JSON vocabulary without saying what it is; you may
>>> want
>>> to reference "your" media types
>>>
>>> - alternatively or additionally, add Link header field examples
>>>
>>> - IANA considerations: replace "this document" with a reference to the
>>> actual section
>>>
>>> - I18N: just point to RFC 5988, Section 8.
>>>
>>>> I am currently at a loss as to what to include for the Security
>>>> Considerations section. I've posted some suggestions/questions within
>>>> this draft; feel free to point me in the proper direction.
>>>
>>> As Mykyta said: cite RFC 5988 and then think about additional issues.
>>>
>>>>    Consideration for links that cross admin boundaries?
>>>>    Infected Sites?
>>>>    Pointing to malicious content?
>>>
>>> ...and maybe link loops. Not sure what can be said; all of these seem to
>>> generic to any kind of following hyperlinks.
>>>
>>>> As soon as I clean up this version, I'll post it to the tracker
>>>> (another first for me<g>).
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Best regards, Julian
>>>
>
>