Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION: collection

[Julian Reschke <[e-mail]>]

On 2011-08-07 04:09, mike amundsen wrote:
> I've posted a "pre-draft" version of the I-D here:
> http://amundsen.com/media-types/files/item-and-collection/
>
> I would appreciate any advice, pointers, suggestions on improving this
> before I post the first submission to the IETF.
> ...

OK. Looks good so far.

A general question: what's the relation between "up" and "collection"? 
Do you see "up" as a special case in that it mentions document hierarchies?

Editorial:

- as Mykyta noted: no need for Section 2 if you don't need the keywords

- the examples use a JSON vocabulary without saying what it is; you may 
want to reference "your" media types

- alternatively or additionally, add Link header field examples

- IANA considerations: replace "this document" with a reference to the 
actual section

- I18N: just point to RFC 5988, Section 8.

> I am currently at a loss as to what to include for the Security
> Considerations section. I've posted some suggestions/questions within
> this draft; feel free to point me in the proper direction.

As Mykyta said: cite RFC 5988 and then think about additional issues.

>     Consideration for links that cross admin boundaries?
>     Infected Sites?
>     Pointing to malicious content?

...and maybe link loops. Not sure what can be said; all of these seem to 
generic to any kind of following hyperlinks.

> As soon as I clean up this version, I'll post it to the tracker
> (another first for me<g>).
> ...

Best regards, Julian