Re: [lisp] draft-farinacci-lisp-crypto-01 - Call for WG Adoption

[Dino Farinacci <[e-mail]>]

> Sorry not sure what you mean by "too late"? If you mean you've
> written early code, that's great. If you mean that it's too

That's what I mean.

> late to get any significant changes compared to this -01 then
> that'd not be at all ok.

No, we are still experimenting and proving.

> And to be clear, by "significant change," I don't mean changing
> from say DH to RSA key transport which'd be a bad plan, but more
> like whether integer or ECDH ought be first up, whether to wait
> on CFRG for new curves, maybe ways of encoding crypto parameters
> etc. Those kinds of change ought be possible at this point IMO
> (if the WG have rough consensus for 'em of course.)

Agree and expect that to happen.

Thanks,
Dino