IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Fwd: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Sun, 08 September 2013 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3585A21F9F9E for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 07:04:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cp5b590fGGxD for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 07:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A8321F9BD8 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 07:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id D217D18C0CE; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 10:04:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: lisp@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20130908140433.D217D18C0CE@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 10:04:33 -0400
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [lisp] Fwd: decentralization of Internet (was Re: Bruce Schneier's Proposal to dedicate November meeting to saving the Internet from the NSA
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:04:39 -0000

    > From: Marc Binderberger <marc@sniff.de>

    > Lisp is separating Identity from Location but this doesn't mean the
    > RLOC can not be used to identify you. In case of static setups this is
    > obvious, take the RLOC, go to the ISP, get the (physical) address and
    > name.

Err, that would get the address and name of the ITR, not the actual source
host.

Depending on all sorts of factors, that plus the encrypted packet _might_ get
them the identity of the actual originator (not, for example, if the ITR has
discarded the key used to encrypt the packet by the time the subpoena
arrives...)

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email