Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub

[Padma Pillay-Esnault <[e-mail]>]

Hi Prasad

Thanks for your comments

See PPE below

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:08 AM Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello Luigi/ Dino,
> A couple of minor comments inline with GVP1>
> >>    • Multicast Support: LISP support for multicast environments has a
> growing number of use cases. Support for multicast is needed in order to
> achieve scalability. The current documents [Ref to experimental multicast
> RFCs] should be merged and published as Standard Track.
> GVP1> Is it correct to understand that the scope of the above item
> includes RFC6831 and RFC8059 (and draft-ietf-pim-jp-extensions). Kindly
> clarify. We have many working implementations based on RFC6831 and hence it
> would be very useful to get them upgraded to Standards Track.
>
> PPE - Yes it does include RFC6831and RFC 8378. There was a discussion
about mechanisms needed and useful. See here
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-116-lisp/ .

>
> >>    • November 2024: Submit merged Multicast document to the IESG for
> >> consideration
> >
> > Note, from the previous email you referred to
> "underlay-multicast-trees". That document has changed its name to reflect
> what it really is designing, its titled draft-vdas-lisp-group-mapping-00.
>
> As for previous comments we better avoid “merged”, may be just use
> “multicast documentS”.
> GVP1> Agreed, this is another important document that we could complete.
>

PPE - ack

Thanks
Padma


> Thanks
> Prasad
>