Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed WG Charter on GitHub]
Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 20 October 2023 05:53 UTC
Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6524EC17C532; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7YRMjNn0h239; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D18BC17C52A; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c51388ccebso5992061fa.3; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1697781210; x=1698386010; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zBto6AUEmYIEbFlE2NTJb2yPeMo0u+s2V83qUgdba+U=; b=KBFIXTCYwa/TvtOPo6xtP0QgXKdI0fuPfDx4LsYcUM9rR1dhMQVXzdMJlZFklwCOEO CW8ZDS00Y9mrguBn8sjfGjunmxuYUJLCbSOwNk0EffOj/Nfx0WOqJq5/TzHIBPbm2muu xj6EdyTWQ+UPcY33GOhmw5dhpWo4DAvccAzUGp56945K7ulzVn72SPE4WypAZw9aPoVi p9rmt5oJ3Wrc4SFkIv+OU+1fuqRsZMK5lDU1mDAc7HuW3uw5v44r5c+qS+8Yc7loOHoq O1cjDy0qyLpxyVPx79XRSojcC++fjEKttKhjrz7v0OW8ftLZEY6mwK4Mqszr+CKENiwk etbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697781210; x=1698386010; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=zBto6AUEmYIEbFlE2NTJb2yPeMo0u+s2V83qUgdba+U=; b=d/n95+KP5loKP8SEqppAu6sgYwBq5qsn8NT7dLpsbqkd9798oS3CiY/1b0eK4Z87I6 kiK3/qsCFg5OK7UfEB7Hzj5UUcoACMsFNazMzluHntIfyFI+klkARTjunIY8t0tZsu0q xzgIDZRZAuEHK0jgvaOO42QKs7nHJ/PvhedSI7EpeVbPlijiuZN5qU4Ml6S+gyj1eJXk cxhpUfpBW7W3A3d0szcqe8hEQv2SqZHwS55wbsSZzObPseaNi9VA9bRpthtQD4aRbIkc JJJ1srX2aRaVI1z1d7JtMSJDDfIf9f9nsCVbXscSDz2ZN7ufbq09IZJn8a8L330WobIa mGgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxO4+wz4GMXXT+X5c4wCFfAWHfgNReIozZIjylyNAIoEUlcDbzC 8I7huvH7bXdGUHwSZu95mcgEXFrw/P3eqzIF/4E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmJ08+/dT5Q+MnmNba8dacOH4A0OEdAf7+QlTjzf/RcBO9EMDtEhdtS/GQguSUY42WnHV4Fm+trYZcWpUeuzc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a543:0:b0:2bc:d6a8:1efd with SMTP id e3-20020a2ea543000000b002bcd6a81efdmr624244ljn.39.1697781210064; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG-CQxqkFVNq_wOFZuK7D6hEz__2mjtZkuu3Z=S-vBKxoJwdfw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB359144DF24114292D527D35AB6CCA@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <7AA2F620-1223-4C17-A3D8-3F9D2AFEDBF5@gigix.net> <CAG-CQxpcLLQousw0qByP_nVYPSDe5j7g7E92J2HVA5d34TQ3EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG-CQxp9SkyHtiqXhDi=L16h2wGRBO4q+gLLW4xQAkHFnNLaZw@mail.gmail.com> <93890FA3-2C5B-4A3A-AC9D-8D704DA0DF87@gigix.net> <1474F61C-549B-4EFD-A6DE-BE407232C2DF@gmail.com> <CAG-CQxqz2LZ-KU7d4DyEoHrsbP+p8tJ7OM2m4M5g7nnGfqVQrg@mail.gmail.com> <E1B3025C-8D86-4634-9B0F-FA1F39BCA3BD@gmail.com> <CAG-CQxpctqd+kxyGXxBaCNd7bPfOEyYrkfrcaoSFNXHCcGGXdA@mail.gmail.com> <81D8A614-3C5F-404A-BD3A-4D0AFA2BBC36@gigix.net> <BYAPR11MB35919AD9151A68E1E9562BF7B6D5A@BYAPR11MB3591.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAG-CQxpJ7gj2i9skWa6QJY-L1Lztt-w+jo-6brBTYhRmge3MVg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG-CQxpJ7gj2i9skWa6QJY-L1Lztt-w+jo-6brBTYhRmge3MVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:53:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxrxUV+BVzS_iD7WpjkEe7vxuSar1dRNbFkDdyK=fywAGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>
Cc: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eeab7c06081f7d83"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/Q-avUqU5fLEHGDsEQbJiHunbBx4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed WG Charter on GitHub]
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 05:53:33 -0000
Hi everyone, I fixed some nits and addressed my previous editorial comments on "Moving to Standards Track:" and "Yang Model:". It can be found here https://github.com/lisp-wg/wg-charter/pull/10/files. Let me know if you have any further comments. Thanks Padma On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:38 PM Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Approved and merged. > > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 10:05 AM Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) < > natal@cisco.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I just sent a PullRequest in GitHub with some edits. You can find it >> here: https://github.com/lisp-wg/wg-charter/pull/9 >> >> >> >> To keep the discussion on the list, here are the main points: >> >> - I switched the Name Encoding and Yang deliverable dates. I have action >> items on both (shepherd for the first and author for the second), and I >> feel Yang might require some time to get it done, while Name Encoding is >> almost there. I don’t think flipping these two dates has major implications. >> >> >> >> - I removed this sentence from the Yang item: “These management methods >> should be considered for both the data-plane, control plane, and mapping >> system components.” I think it is probably redundant and it might >> confuse more than clarify (isn’t mapping system a subset of control plane?) >> >> >> >> - I polished the language on the milestones to be consistent across the >> different items (using the same sentence structure, etc). I also use >> “document(s)” for the document bundles and those items further in the >> future, so we are flexible in how to address them. >> >> >> >> Other than that, it’s just minor edits. Let me know if you have any >> comment. >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Alberto >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> >> *Date: *Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 2:01 PM >> *To: *Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> >> *Cc: *Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, LISP mailing list list < >> lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org <lisp-chairs@ietf.org> >> *Subject: *Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed WG Charter >> on GitHub] >> >> Hi Dino, Padma, >> >> >> >> The list of milestones I proposed does not have more than 2 item per >> deadline, which is reasonable to me. >> >> However, some milestones do indeed refer to several documents like >> Privacy and Security, Multicast, and mobility. >> >> IMO there is no need to list the detailed documents and if we finish >> before the schedule this is a plus not a problem. >> >> >> >> Since Nov 2023 is in 2 weeks I agree with Padma that there is no need to >> rush. >> >> >> >> The name encoding document was indeed missing, since it is a simple >> document we can publish it by March 2024. >> >> >> >> The update list looks like: >> >> >> >> 1. November 2023: Submit a LISP Yang model document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 2. March 2024: Submit LISP Traffic Engineering document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 3. March 2024: Submit LISP Reliable Transport document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 4. March 2024: Submit LISP Name Encoding document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 5. June 2024 : Submit LISP geo-coordinates to the IESG for consideration >> >> 6. June 2024: Submit a LISP NAT Traversal document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 7. November 2024: Submit 8111bis to the IESG for consideration >> >> 8. November 2024: Submit merged LCAFbis document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 9. March 2025: Submit LISP Privacy and Security documents to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 10. March 2025: Submit 6832bis Proxy XTRs document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 11. June 2025: Submit LISP Mobile documents to the IESG for consideration >> >> 12. November 2025: Submit Multicast documents to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 13. March 2026: Submit LISP Applicability document to the IESG for >> consideration >> >> 14. November 2026: Wrap-Up or recharter >> >> >> >> >> >> Better? >> >> >> >> L. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 17, 2023, at 01:46, Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Dino >> >> >> >> The groupings look good! >> >> >> >> Some dates look too aggressive Nov 2023: draft-ietf-lisp-geo, >> draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding, RFC 8060 and 9306 (Standards Track). We are >> already there ... >> >> As the dates proposed are target dates, i suggest we keep the date of >> June 2024 but if we can go faster it is all good. thoughts? >> >> >> >> Similar comment for mobility. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Padma >> >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:35 PM Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > What do you think of putting some major milestones for mobility and >> security sections rather than per document? >> >> I think security is further out compared to mobility. Just because other >> groups will have to peer-review the security documents. But good suggestion >> and will incldue below the set that go together (IMO). >> >> So here is what I suggest: >> >> For June 2024: Mobility documents as a set to IESG, which include: >> >> draft-ietf-lisp-eid-mobility, draft-ietf-lisp-mn, >> draft-ietf-lisp-predictive-rlocs, draft-ietf-lisp-vpn >> >> And for June 2025: Security documents as a set to IESG, which include: >> >> draft-ietf-lisp-crypto (RFC8061 to Standards Track), >> draft-ietf-lisp-ecdsa-auth, draft-ietf-lisp-eid-anonymity >> >> And then, not related to what you asked for, to put all LCAF related >> stuff in one set: >> >> For Nov 2023: >> >> draft-ietf-lisp-geo, draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding, RFC 8060 and 9306 >> (Standards Track) >> >> What do you think? >> >> Dino >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
- [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Joel Halpern
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Alvaro Retana
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Prakash Jain (prakjain)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Prakash Jain (prakjain)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub Luigi Iannone
- [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed WG C… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Luigi Iannone
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Dino Farinacci
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Padma Pillay-Esnault
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Prakash Jain (prakjain)
- Re: [lisp] WG work items list [WAS: Re: Proposed … Prakash Jain (prakjain)