IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub

Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 10 October 2023 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302CCC151086; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BOUND_DIGITS_15=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3BiIxX54O302; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com (mail-lj1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D6DEC14CE3F; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2c3e23a818bso21162221fa.0; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696909770; x=1697514570; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mLC6LVKdj5ULweKZJ8GJmyAyhor7RxjzbM3qhWIzjII=; b=lThlNEyIFsCVxwb/QSTMW4Id69Vi8sZXqrQax3s4PChom0HNtgAw6QWGhXKP2qJFHI 4+H6IzaP9JNpnACcdbrEiWSDLdTsGtlCHIkUZQWM/3QJzbCaGkXACp3nb8j7kURYb+ND 9BFPjgdNhyqAHj5jdS2j5kjMTXX946KEZm6cMpEKT+IJ+NJpMH00337V9knUhx09zLA3 62RLK5Wy7NKRKgH2/OoBEYmGTTXG+eKlqxwUCc7IJkfQyRa9w/Bpkg8stdre4acg8IsG Bm0KtHm8O2MZ30JEcAsW0UlB+hkGkWWIYwxim4zpjt2X638McwBm46++cq0HevmiInk8 EA9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696909770; x=1697514570; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=mLC6LVKdj5ULweKZJ8GJmyAyhor7RxjzbM3qhWIzjII=; b=kBVDAZ3TOw/TFoOt896OaaAmcdzbCtgnf/oyxVyu2iY4bkqn2LxBKO2l2ijK3I53OE fuHOkCZAIbrSJS6nAqfQU+NbXsgdIb18xOA10Q2hyzkMNlEH+eb90KMkdSurHSYvlHb/ hLMIkB9fnLLHSpbYREYCbtZ554haxZGwt0mavL0cp+cCgyg9D9Hz/Y+Po+m3PAEKNDSk YQOOii46WA2DRNWqmHKt6/KoiTuuBL2sYhDyNwfIh84KRoQSzl0UQItL1QzSLflHGP+U bNagul+45Q4i8WYC+uKM1JCiqQsgdiiGH8ti/Xi4uoVHTevUA5jsKlkOBqPpyhfj+oBn QY/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzm8Q/IfOrlHukYZY2M2MbZnKQT2XrKsMUMJeWO7D8mXkiZ4QnF jQ/pOkHabQq6W8hzcuI+HD6aqmiI1AsimAvffqg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEKwqeUPWl1/fQsshAWFIhYmHio6CjOZ8UQZuYgmHPxwwvvK29ss1cUID2NpgKuBCcE4hLWl37U+gUKDQ+L0J4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8516:0:b0:2c3:ef14:a5c1 with SMTP id j22-20020a2e8516000000b002c3ef14a5c1mr1993320lji.21.1696909770182; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAG-CQxqkFVNq_wOFZuK7D6hEz__2mjtZkuu3Z=S-vBKxoJwdfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsy46LBEmS539CM4BzHMVuX6TmrS1GQN3ssZkEs1jF60fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAG-CQxp3a5_ct0CKOB8b_CMs2i8t1UPgkXUDKJk+anntk-qY4g@mail.gmail.com> <0309588C-DD01-4703-BE31-17C0A5129BC2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0309588C-DD01-4703-BE31-17C0A5129BC2@gmail.com>
From: Padma Pillay-Esnault <padma.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:49:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAG-CQxrw1=bnj67Axwm+q0Puf87mWDEJntu1d=PnDTj2CO3Tew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>, lisp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001154000607549849"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/u08ijECMLprljCNd5_gDPWpyYn4>
Subject: Re: [lisp] Proposed WG Charter on GitHub
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 03:49:34 -0000

Noted.

Thanks
Padma

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 2:11 PM Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:

> > PPE: It was proposed to merge the experimental RFCs RFC6831 & RFC8378.
> However, how they are used in Replication List entries is in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vda-lisp-underlay-multicast-trees/.
> It is still open if all three docs should be merged in a big document or
> preferable to have several docs. It would be great to hear feedback from
> the WG.
>
> I propose (and prefer) seperate docs since RFC6831 is really large and
> details the interaction of LISP with PIM used in the underlay. And RFC8378
> focuses solely on an unicast underlay. And of course
> draft-vda-lisp-underlay-multicast-trees allows you to have a mix of unicast
> and multicast RLOC mappings which both RFC6831 and RFC8378 use.
>
> Dino
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email