Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption

Sharon Barkai <Sharon@Contextream.com> Mon, 22 December 2014 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Sharon@Contextream.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8EF1A6FB2 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:39:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gsrFMPxWRRJF for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:39:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0635.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE57F1A6F56 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 11:39:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DB4PR06MB0909.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (25.161.250.141) by DB4PR06MB0911.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (25.161.250.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.49.12; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:35:51 +0000
Received: from DB4PR06MB0909.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.250.141]) by DB4PR06MB0909.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.250.141]) with mapi id 15.01.0049.002; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:35:50 +0000
From: Sharon Barkai <Sharon@Contextream.com>
To: "Victor Moreno (vimoreno)" <vimoreno@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
Thread-Index: AQHQHgeGi+EL4oDMKU2hVopI6RblaZyb4YaAgAAfZgk=
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:35:50 +0000
Message-ID: <525C8DAA-5FD9-4DAE-85E3-F680601FA3CE@Contextream.com>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net> <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net> <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>, <13346F57-8C24-4455-8501-EEE7DFD86AFB@gmail.com>, <BEE5EEF1-600C-4836-AD9C-BD552D2274C6@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEE5EEF1-600C-4836-AD9C-BD552D2274C6@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.22.28.27]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Sharon@Contextream.com;
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB0911;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB4PR06MB0911;
x-forefront-prvs: 0433DB2766
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(53754006)(479174004)(377454003)(189002)(51704005)(199003)(76176999)(33656002)(106116001)(19580405001)(106356001)(19580395003)(82746002)(97736003)(40100003)(105586002)(120916001)(2950100001)(62966003)(36756003)(15975445007)(77156002)(99396003)(110136001)(230783001)(92566001)(46102003)(68736005)(122556002)(102836002)(87936001)(2900100001)(54356999)(2656002)(50986999)(93886004)(31966008)(83716003)(107046002)(4396001)(101416001)(21056001)(86362001)(64706001)(20776003)(66066001)(104396002)(80792004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DB4PR06MB0911; H:DB4PR06MB0909.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: Contextream.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Contextream.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Dec 2014 19:35:50.5394 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 31ea6a41-1b19-4e44-95ed-6c61c89a1582
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB4PR06MB0911
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/WiThw3ywmzDmFunX3PID74g1qPo
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:39:42 -0000

++ for 1

--szb

On Dec 22, 2014, at 09:43, Victor Moreno (vimoreno) <vimoreno@cisco.com> wrote:

+ 1

Victor

> On Dec 22, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I like option (1) and think the document should be adopted.
> 
> Dino
> 
>> On Dec 22, 2014, at 7:12 AM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
>> 
>> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices:
>> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to address the milestone.
>> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to address the milestone.
>> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to do this.
>> 
>> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted.
>> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what "different" looks like.  Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date, but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us understand your opposition.
>> If you like (3), please explain.  That path seems likely to waste more time than producing a good document.  Particularly since we have what looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable.
>> 
>> Speak up, please.
>> 
>> Yours,
>> Joel
>> 
>>> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> 
>>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call
>>> for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.
>>> 
>>> There was actually very little reaction on this call.
>>> 
>>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another.
>>> 
>>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A
>>> description of the impacts of LISP”.
>>> 
>>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th
>>> January 2015).
>>> 
>>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Luigi & Joel
>>> 
>>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net
>>>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi All,
>>>> 
>>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07
>>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07]
>>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
>>>> adoption.
>>>> 
>>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
>>>> meeting outcome.
>>>> The call ends on  December 19th 2014.
>>>> 
>>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of
>>>> approval or disapproval.
>>>> 
>>>> Recall that:
>>>> 
>>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>>>> expected to
>>>> modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
>>>> content is solid.
>>>> Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
>>>> changes to its content.
>>>> 
>>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state
>>>> your reasons why,
>>>> and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>>>> 
>>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues
>>>> and we can
>>>> begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>>>> Luigi and Joel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
lisp@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp