Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption

Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> Tue, 30 December 2014 21:43 UTC

Return-Path: <lori@lispmob.org>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C281A875C for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:43:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lfGG0UEjIP1l for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from roura.ac.upc.es (roura.ac.upc.edu [147.83.33.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A941A1BB5 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 13:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw-3.ac.upc.es (gw-3.ac.upc.es [147.83.30.9]) by roura.ac.upc.es (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sBULhgKl026580; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:43:42 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [89.123.106.73]) by gw-3.ac.upc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 538109DC; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 22:43:42 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54A31C8B.9000908@lispmob.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 23:43:39 +0200
From: Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org>
Organization: LISPmob
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
References: <2529C978-FA62-47B0-A223-0B85276DC2D3@gigix.net> <40D65A23-0FB0-4D1B-BC87-367AE8367541@gigix.net> <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <549834F6.1090609@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/XuEbcHpg_01XeK8IaxubPpx3qHw
Subject: Re: [lisp] [EXTENDED] draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07 - Call for WG Adoption
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:43:48 -0000

Hi,

I support option #1.

-Lori

On 12/22/2014 05:12 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> To amplify Luigi's comment, we have several choices:
> 1) We can use this document as the basis for the working group action to
> address the milestone.
> 2) We can use something else as a basis for working group action to
> address the milestone.
> 3) We can go fight about whether this matters because we don't want to
> do this.
> 
> If you like option (1), tell us you want the document adopted.
> If you like option (2), please say so and give us some idea of what
> "different" looks like.  Best if you offer to provide a draft by a date,
> but even just a paragraph or two on what "different" is would help us
> understand your opposition.
> If you like (3), please explain.  That path seems likely to waste more
> time than producing a good document.  Particularly since we have what
> looks to the chairs like a very good start on this deliverable.
> 
> Speak up, please.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 12/22/14 10:08 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> the two weeks have elapsed since the beginning of the WG Adoption Call
>>   for draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07.
>>
>> There was actually very little reaction on this call.
>>
>> Silence does not help to make a decision, one way or another.
>>
>> Recall that our charter explicitly state that we will work on "A
>> description of the impacts of LISP”.
>>
>> The WG Adoption Call is extended for another two weeks (until 5th
>> January 2015).
>>
>> Please take this opportunity to express your opinion on this document.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Luigi & Joel
>>
>>> On 04 Dec 2014, at 12:27, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net
>>> <mailto:ggx@gigix.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> During the 91st IETF authors of the draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07
>>> [https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saucez-lisp-impact-07]
>>> asked for WG adoption. Meeting participants expressed consensus on
>>> adoption.
>>>
>>> This message begins the two weeks call for WG adoption to confirm the
>>> meeting outcome.
>>> The call ends on  December 19th 2014.
>>>
>>> Please respond to the LISP mailing list with any statements of
>>> approval or disapproval.
>>>
>>> Recall that:
>>>
>>> - This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is
>>> expected to
>>>   modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the
>>> content is solid.
>>>   Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see
>>> changes to its content.
>>>
>>> - If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state
>>> your reasons why,
>>>   and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>>>
>>> - If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues
>>> and we can
>>>   begin a dialog about how best to address them.
>>> Luigi and Joel
>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp