IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Mon, 27 October 2014 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C5D1A0039 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hr-RO495DlX6 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D41731A00AB for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id p10so5991409pdj.33 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mUFcBUlyl7G/VZ/C5Ma9VDrXVO0RzygELff41r+gOic=; b=q9g/xP/8cGk5WTPoDY+h9CBknTC4taLHcQ2OJ1aIqq1HFlcfGFvbASBsCs5eK/ZD0P EQBK/DytPnBP48pJoXnhzSdl1Jd5JsLKQ/PhBV706ZJQYdkDfR6QlLh26tZgNpf91M59 pDTsEzAc347zKWiMQRgbi0ZX/6cvS0LswSaFL1F+B8AVyR6H6TIRHENdNK7WWiys2EfH T/6ZTV5DSrXQmP8bZT3u7hbhRWYUv5O8MuECgZt0nAClPjEGxyHISXZGevuT+vBE+hyp 7ve69Vb4sWTHlZwqprRLuKA2Fc26LQNTuMp3A9vzo4I+uU3aY+CdPrdbD1swXeCm0PdP PY/w==
X-Received: by 10.68.125.164 with SMTP id mr4mr25714596pbb.78.1414429094522; Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.1.144.7] ([166.170.40.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z4sm11385204pda.23.2014.10.27.09.58.12 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-E1272FDC-E67B-4E3A-B52C-E1C91652EA3D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B411)
In-Reply-To: <BAD45A38-4569-4C58-9DB9-78F5CC6DF96F@lispmob.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:58:10 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <67A91D55-DE9E-465B-A2A8-25035D72B9F7@gmail.com>
References: <6D803253-77B7-4126-8602-66E2C852E91F@gigix.net> <BAD45A38-4569-4C58-9DB9-78F5CC6DF96F@lispmob.org>
To: Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/c2MY50o3XkmRN0JcTwOIzLkpBis
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] WG Last Call on draft-lisp-introduction-07
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp/>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 16:58:17 -0000

Since we are in last call and these are simple changes, I think they should go in. 

Dino


> On Oct 27, 2014, at 7:08 AM, Lori Jakab <lori@lispmob.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Well structured and written document, with the right balance between brevity and detail.
> 
> A few small nits, which can be fixed in a later update:
> - The last paragraph of the introduction refers to the “LISP specifications” in plural and lists a single reference. I think it should read “LISP specification”.
> - First paragraph of Section 3 s/inetrworking/interworking/ Same in Section 3.5
> - I think someone already mentioned this in a previous review, I would replace dashes with parentheses when used like this: "typically -but not limited to- an IPv4 or IPv6 address”
> - Right before Section 3.4.3.1 s/LISP-ALT and LISP+DDT/LISP+ALT and LISP-DDT/
> 
> -Lori
> 
>> On Oct 25, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:
>> 
>> All,
>> 
>> A lot of work has been done lately on draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07 and the authors requested a work group last call.
>> 
>> This email starts a WG last call, to end November 14th, 2014.
>> 
>> You will find the document here:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-introduction-07
>> 
>> Please review this WG document.  Let the working group know if you agree that it is ready for handing to the AD, or if you see issues with it. 
>> If you see issues, please be as specific as possible about the problems, and if possible suggest text to resolve them.
>> 
>> Joel & Luigi
>> _______________________________________________
>> lisp mailing list
>> lisp@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> lisp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email