IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ltru] Re: Suggested text for future compatibility of registry processors.

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 16 July 2007 09:31 UTC

Return-path: <ltru-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMvK-0005Oj-Bv; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:31:22 -0400
Received: from ltru by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMvI-0005Oc-W5 for ltru-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:31:20 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMvI-0005OT-Me for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:31:20 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr ([192.134.4.11]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IAMvE-0003jD-D3 for ltru@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:31:20 -0400
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 0DF3D1C00E3; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:31:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A631C00E0; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:31:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8A358ECAE; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:31:15 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:31:15 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Message-ID: <20070716093115.GC9841@nic.fr>
References: <E1I9ghp-0006L9-0h@megatron.ietf.org> <011d01c7c66d$3dbe3900$6401a8c0@DGBP7M81> <20070714233255.GR9402@mercury.ccil.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070714233255.GR9402@mercury.ccil.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 4.0
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Suggested text for future compatibility of registry processors.
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ltru-bounces@ietf.org

On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 07:32:55PM -0400,
 John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote 
 a message of 19 lines which said:

> "Be liberal in what you accept" is a general IETF principle.

And not always a good one, specially in the case of the LSR where
there is just one supplier of data. Being liberal when you accept
stuff from many unknown clients is one thing, when there is only one,
the IANA, I doubt it is a good idea.




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email