[Ltru] Rechartering (in general)

["Randy Presuhn" <[e-mail]>]

Hi -

As co-chair...

The thread "[Ltru] rechartering to handle 639-6 (was FW:Anomalyinupcomingregistry)"
seems to have reached rough consensus that it does not make sense to recharter
at this time in order to cope with ISO's upcoming 639-6.

Does anyone see any other potential good reasons to recharter the ltru working
group at this time?  I don't care about theoretical possibilities.
I'm only interested in work that:

  (1) working group participants feel is important;

  (2) to which working group participants would commit resources; 

  (3) should commence in the near future; and

  (4) could not be accomplished through the normal operation of
      [e-mail] and the registry

In other words, if you don't personally see it as important, or you are
not personally willing to spend time writing / reviewing I-Ds on the
issue, or if you think it can reasonably be handled under a 4646bis regime,
or if you think it should be started 18 months or so from now, then I don't
want to hear about it.

Randy