Re: [manet] Some comments on draft-funkfeuer-manet-olsrv2-etx-01

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 23 May 2011 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19423E0670 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gdA-Gap365fv for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com (mail-qw0-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2071FE0658 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qwc23 with SMTP id 23so4719652qwc.31 for <manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=/8NOonGSpsakJCtX0V1Xi+qTGg0PIuHv4pFQnZuRM9E=; b=dwnBm5bi5TGA7o1XLw+inCrpspz2yIdU1jXedoqANcXTqiyR81SY3zN/noWFWf1u3j eZmtJm898w48z52Sm1PF/l5ApB8NBXqBeM4vUi1CPezAzAMBCQ6GngDbyfM9ayYgZAoS uEkgnRM2sMUyFLbv6ZMYw8bKFRUMcfup26hZw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vSKk+7WRu7x4xGmKKQyNwJjhJaUewVuLGucmjtzxV2b4Kx35iKFDimipDUQd6QlajA nN+8+lxiCdhy+HU+lsbnSqdwF4NyMZyG7chgX6Hxr1cDAKc5tt6mM2+BQcgW7h3uCOUj 5CuBj7J5MCv4PDdAjOSzOyD5qrIKtzFNYIws8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.56.148 with SMTP id y20mr1963740qcg.283.1306172806497; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.89.72 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2011 10:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:46:46 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTimnw2=d-8O7QeUu2=Q+ZfJ6dtWYzw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: manet@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd5cb6225870b04a3f50ef4"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 May 2011 11:48:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [manet] Some comments on draft-funkfeuer-manet-olsrv2-etx-01
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:46:48 -0000

> > > How can packet sizes of lost packets be measured?

> > Maybe with a second packet sequence number that is only increased for

> > large packets ?



If we want exact information it seems that the source or dest_nieghbours may
inform the destination of the lost packets sizes if requested by the
destination. The source should be able to list all the sent packets SQ
number with its size index by the packets destinations. The destination
sends to source a request of the sizes of packets (using special packet for
measure).



Or more simple method can be called the size SQ method proposed above, so
the source, path_nodes and destination are counting the packet by possible
categorized of size information/measured. We may have second/third/more
sequence (size_sequence) in three or four as very large, large, medium,
small. Therefore, when the dest size sequence count is different from the
source it will notice the lost and measure the size.