IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [manet] SMF in Manet and MPR

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 01 February 2024 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: manet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED4DC151981 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:14:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u_7lcUQ5g6J7 for <manet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35302C151710 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2024 08:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33aea66a31cso639032f8f.1 for <manet@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 08:14:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706804083; x=1707408883; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XM4vEocP334OdEzm07tMmhEWfowvg0r39JPukn/tjSA=; b=lYpg1EiCerMlwEaOcEl2fZPYQsWAa4YUkRXbdEw++ZQz2nau6vr9DeehG9I11E3IwN 7SFSVps2hczzRfKL9VPCH5ziEJNu2sVmqCchQQM/a006QfzvM1ealG1K3RJ/BH/FLMm1 hVgr8xqmZ94/yfKjMnrqSzsDm/07CT/csiF2a72kn1MmAuGebhO3DAgMuLTPUpll7fj5 fBI4hh8MIUncWJapezsjmjO9q02gCu50bYqC5x1fMrmeCN3xpl0v9TiR9YqzFTetdYqJ is7LPcMAjoYAKALHJL9gIwBQBixooOeNXr3+qOxX5XDHQnr9T0NafjVSBBw7ty9ycsSX WbZQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706804083; x=1707408883; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XM4vEocP334OdEzm07tMmhEWfowvg0r39JPukn/tjSA=; b=nqleHq0m9oDtSiZArFsjBkvdc5GgZCO1Pf+mlCEUtQrHs0VVznMB2+DNDTl3zOhFVC AFz6gWDZio+WSEgoqbBrOLsJpnwjSJGZc9/LSlnw2o6asuPy/f3lBX+7R0SXV2TZ8mQk 81rqIYjTvvAXE3PaVEYR0/v1PQA26SAEu0wOYNO7YFfx2z9TtLRx8JjkgIIGYf9986e+ 5XbfEcHgHN8F8TMs/h4BFVaY2reO9/A25q3o396Z0UaeXGzJBY/rowDOJ4OoWgiBNp21 8aEIzmtFGVSshKmgEQtWYgkuQ7i+A/cwxKe/jWoGfiVxlXSLP1NTqrILIZS81LOL1QpB fB+w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwizAFJGelmHLX29/0Xz03b5ueD5tCoOadm9sa+mycthu57NHLv 5/rcMPiY9KezXdM1CG5c4kH1/PqSU2pyPDR1lDu0Z6EVmai9+Ynm7XbemAoiUmiEeKvTJ61CGd5 C2fWf80iv17HQf5bZJDPaHE5MKEE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEApkx9C7W7r3bavQ3W9u8GXibHzrEil+vzYf9oeWWztIJHXUzSZMcoaKZrWkJl6XUcU5kQIig62XnUs7z/hvU=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:a40c:0:b0:33a:f5ea:bd7d with SMTP id d12-20020adfa40c000000b0033af5eabd7dmr4508519wra.69.1706804083069; Thu, 01 Feb 2024 08:14:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGnRvuoAdGeuzESf4VgYVB2xkEBX=t+3Vm4BMn0q37OKx9_jAQ@mail.gmail.com> <34F68A6F-F4A3-4B9C-A4DD-549246154F67@nrl.navy.mil> <CADnDZ8_kDp__Gx8aCBdCmnH_5z9zq6yRSjnkUJB7bYyFs7FvtA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGnRvurt6R1y=ZSMNOmOEPF+FY4GYGzroek3ntt3024ASpVJuw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGnRvurt6R1y=ZSMNOmOEPF+FY4GYGzroek3ntt3024ASpVJuw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 18:12:04 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ8-cXhEw==WTP7gDyrL+mgSzKzjUzovFgOsLA_edJ7pxrw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com>
Cc: "Adamson, Robert B CIV USN NRL (5522) Washington DC (USA)" <brian.adamson=40nrl.navy.mil@dmarc.ietf.org>, MANET IETF <manet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000129db50610544b75"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/manet/Z1iCnunqHoK73J0EixxAz_stZiI>
Subject: Re: [manet] SMF in Manet and MPR
X-BeenThere: manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile Ad-hoc Networks <manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/manet/>
List-Post: <mailto:manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet>, <mailto:manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 16:14:45 -0000

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 10:13 AM Henning Rogge <hrogge@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:04 PM Abdussalam Baryun
> <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I would like if possible an update/information in 2024 about SMF
> implementation or RFC6621 implementation regarding its use in OLSRv2 RFC7181
>
> SMF is not used in OLSRv2... it's the other way around, the MPR
> results of OLSRv2 can be used in SMF.
>
> > I suggest that the RFC6621 implementation must use PACKET BB (i.e. MANET
> Packet) RFC5444 if it is to be used with WG standard routing , because
> OLSRv2 RFC7181 is using RFC5444. Or is there other suggestions we can
> discuss?
>
> I suggest you read RFC6621 again...
>

Ok, will do and will reply on this issue,  because it has been long time
since my last read of 6621.

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email