IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] WGLC for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Thu, 03 June 2021 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8DE3A267C for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jSvZzAfcYGW for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com (mail-ed1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9736D3A267A for <masque@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id t3so5381632edc.7 for <masque@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nwdc2Pt3u69/H8O1cP52ozUMr1h/6hoJ9GifsOcwIck=; b=gtMj+9o6NwHUK47Vc3MSXqGCO4yXrmQeKPTdTHLtr9MqwLOyUqzEwzEGOWVWFQB41j FacQa91LAWUS/rP8LIoVFW7KaYrUBJ9x0saG+KAoAdq/Lu+j5h2iPNzg9mDNJ2RfD1Pb eswyT+wLwAC8YZJ7vpYAGFZCyJUIOnzvKOTnzaO+3fozn05cdZoiiKAT5GAoIzPIiZlZ ezGi8Py6RVvk9p6aQQOifi0tMxLTyDrNUPiqFPuUoWfZZGLgRjqGbaHmrtakwq3geb/m JTSYtGTHT0oQaP99dUbzvFpmMqW0emn1OIeMw+GEk754Bluke0th5/SiygIoAI/thiXi wAXQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nwdc2Pt3u69/H8O1cP52ozUMr1h/6hoJ9GifsOcwIck=; b=LytlDI/b40PkMPRMwZFw436P8J3V8pUNa44OuM2G0sbxsmDCN7+ftcNbkhx+anJEFM D+lemVZWwB/UiOIeIs6Cr6hxBjwrHXXvEGikr+cePrEUM6V28vhb32KbyKUDTa43UpW2 NXnbTz8GyEuw1vq3QbiYw7kZ7cPp4+eMzvxwQ8DsIYiLlS/ynP7OyUH8nFflVqt/Zwe8 tmVTPeqJZ+24SetDrknJBrI9OKMmbOG+B/OOXVBmZHbeCEXguDqp892pBZwvM1RL97FQ MEfmQmsjlPIYbxTnddMvzHPbJqhfcHkFdugDfrj6qkNgq8p5o+OUnSJ5FwqdpT4DGquA xFEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5337Fn6QAaY9hsDEqZWWVHvf9+OdbGmWhXzXbJRpQuhe3OPy2NiT f+7Q5AgRknuMmTc4Cren1FlJdgigCj7yPK/1rrQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwI7pdGlDYaCyVwr78lwfL33eUUB1HXFKn9LdlSvJtYZJjbrQ9CAqu+GuJzHyDLWJf/1zyWyjgjI6trQrvEzuY=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:d54c:: with SMTP id f12mr41261449edj.301.1622690275873; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <d314198b-6c01-4b15-84d8-9896b5fdee80@www.fastmail.com> <HE1PR0702MB3772355483E2771650C6D679953F9@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <746F7E16-37BD-49EF-896A-649D394CCB05@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <746F7E16-37BD-49EF-896A-649D394CCB05@ericsson.com>
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:17:43 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+bf51R5omZAaeJQPATO3AMQg4Ld2o_KAPMenScJRq5jpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, caw@heapingbits.net, masque@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079577905c3d40595"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/PNCs2QKoTNcFV2CqRopPfmG70x8>
Subject: Re: [Masque] WGLC for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 03:18:04 -0000

Peace,

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021, 11:13 AM Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=
40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> However, I also don't think spending more time on the requirements is a
> useful exercise and I would prefer to move on to work on the protocol (even
> without final consensus on the requirements).
>

Frankly, if brought out of context, that would be the scariest thing to
hear on a software project, or really on a project of any kind, especially
on those involving more than one developer.

"Let's just start the development without clear understanding of what we
do, and we'll declare success once we're too tired to continue together".
Has this ever worked well, other than by accident?

--
Töma

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email