Re: [mdnsext] mDNSext features/requirements rollup

[peter van der Stok <[e-mail]>]

Hi Kerry and Stuart,

I went through the req. document

A typo in section 1 line 4:
... find that mDNS does NOT work across routers.  << NOT added by me >>

I do miss the following use case (also missing in hybrid-01 document), 
expected for control networks in building at intallation time.

Devices are connected to a mesh network that is not connected to an 
edge router. These devices can do service disovery as suggested in 
hybrid-1 document, but no DNS server, no DHCP server and no edge router 
are accessible. A DNS proxy can be present. DNS proxy can be configured 
off-line or with specially designed tools on-line.

After connection of this mesh network to an edge router and 
accompanying connection to DNS server, applications in devices are 
expected to use same domain names and be discoverable over edge router.

I hope this case can be made explicit in section 3 point (E) of req 
document, by citing that mesh network can be (temporarily) stand-alone 
without edge router accessibility.
In REQ2: add use case E to cases A and B
In REQ3: add use case E to cases C and D.

Peter van der Stok