IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mif] Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 09 September 2011 00:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA3F21F8B3A for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.568
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.568 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.031, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J2VdG+AcHYo3 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7424F21F8B18 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 17:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shinkuro.com (69-196-144-227.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A2391ECB422 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 00:11:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 20:11:01 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: mif@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20110909001101.GS38973@shinkuro.com>
References: <COL118-W599D9E8760C3E370077FC3B1140@phx.gbl> <4E683F9B.7020905@gmail.com> <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE4430969620256F33F@008-AM1MPN1-032.mgdnok.nokia.com> <4E692D62.5080902@gmail.com> <BFFE3312-4DE3-432D-8DC7-20987AB3E34A@network-heretics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BFFE3312-4DE3-432D-8DC7-20987AB3E34A@network-heretics.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [mif] Last Call for MIF DNS server selection document
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:09:48 -0000

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:22:17PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
> 
> I'm quite surprised that MIF was able to get this far with the document without the issue being raised.

Have I really been so polite that this qualifies as "not raised"?  I
apologise to everyone, then.  But I've been uneasy about this since
early in my work on the DNS64 drafts.  I'm getting perhaps too adept
at nose-holding.

A


-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email