IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mmox] taxonomy of topics

Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com> Thu, 26 February 2009 01:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jwatte@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE5528C1E7 for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XltH8D1FLP5m for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57D028C1C2 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b2so317645ana.4 for <mmox@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:51:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m3YmdvYkJ4v2yQUSTzY+cjY+HfFssLUmfpKUdkve2F0=; b=tgDycLcpQy5RcH+2Oac54qugt12JXZgTu94vLV45M+BaH5IvJhlayBkxY1xd/rTOGr SqKd5GhCglv7CIDl/QR1AypkgNgbIrYAv3UUteYoTQLONXRKHvVWg5BFt+xI3pvsLAo5 nkLw/PK2GbOP6xIywode2BYQWKcZttVIwIBus=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iMAYhoakTBBz2AhTlw9Ztb7f19N7YVn0bzNLeLfiwUJnxkiiR3uN9J0UEE6WTox+NX h6BQN5QAxczJ/oBDpNuuMABHWT/TT0lnu2bH8rPcMb/Qtf0iepcOFO1mp+M28UwS6opb Ct2oHpTMLlq90SMWS3CmwmJnDliGNvyUDDlUM=
Received: by 10.100.227.6 with SMTP id z6mr1093111ang.111.1235613068294; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.168.111? (smtp.forterrainc.com [208.64.184.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d38sm3965183and.29.2009.02.25.17.51.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:51:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49A5F589.4090803@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:51:05 -0800
From: Jon Watte <jwatte@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
References: <05E4C6F6-14A9-42AF-9314-A51F8DF0A7C3@lindenlab.com> <e0b04bba0902251659x783a8829h3f0990fd8735c48d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba0902251659x783a8829h3f0990fd8735c48d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] taxonomy of topics
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:50:48 -0000

Morgaine wrote:
> I wonder if perhaps we could do both, and thus avoid the conflict:  
> separate OGP and MMOX workgroups.  An OGP workgroup would be an 
> excellent thing to work on, and as an AWG member I would certainly 
> like to help fill in the parts that OGP has not yet defined.  But a 
> MMOX group that targets the broader reaches of VW interop is also 
> highly worthwhile, and much more visionary, and valuable to many more 
> people.

Why couldn't OGP stay in the AWG?

And assuming that's the split, then would the Second Life people still 
be interested in the broader interoperability?

Sincerely,

jw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email