Re: [mmox] IETF policy question
Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> Fri, 27 March 2009 17:51 UTC
Return-Path: <tme@multicasttech.com>
X-Original-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmox@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990D63A6CBC for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yi72UnoBBZeq for <mmox@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multicasttech.com (lennon.multicasttech.com [63.105.122.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA963A6CAF for <mmox@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [63.105.122.7] (account marshall_eubanks HELO [IPv6:::1]) by multicasttech.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 15117674; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:50:33 -0500
Message-Id: <5D554396-70F4-475E-9656-A6FD64E34F5F@multicasttech.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: Heiner Wolf <wolf.heiner@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5f303cb80903251620k163ede14y38e8785d94a417b3@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:52:43 -0400
References: <5f303cb80903251620k163ede14y38e8785d94a417b3@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
Cc: mmox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mmox] IETF policy question
X-BeenThere: mmox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Massively Multi-participant Online Games and Applications <mmox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmox>
List-Post: <mailto:mmox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox>, <mailto:mmox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:51:51 -0000
Hello; I am not wearing any hats here, and this is my own opinion. On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:20 PM, Heiner Wolf wrote: > Hi, > > Assumed there are multiple systems with incompatible architecture, > each sophisticated and with it's own protocols. > Assumed that we as a WG do not know enough about the general problem > space. This to me sounds like an IRTF Research Group should be chartered. (I.e., it sounds like there is research, not just engineering, here.) > > Assumed that there are sub-groups which know enough about their > problem and have working solutions. > This is not clear to me. Do you mean "there are sub-pieces A, B, C,... of the problem, and for at least some of the sub-pieces there are working solutions and groups willing to work on them" or "there are alternative proposals A, B, C,... and for at least some of these proposals there are working solutions and groups willing to work on them" For the first situation, in my opinion there is nothing wrong with the WG taking a bottom up approach, or spinning off WG to focus on the pieces. It depends on the details, of course. If the second applies, you may be about to learn about the rough part of rough consensus. Regards Marshall > What would the IETF do? > 1. task one of the sub-groups to standardize one of the > protocol/architecture variants, although it might leave a large part > of the community out of the loop, while having at least a hope to > defeat fragmentation in the future > ...or... > 2. do not standardize at IETF level, which might be good for the > competition of ideas and allows the community to learn more about the > general problem space, but preserves fragmentation unless the market > cleans it up. > > I am really undecided, but there is probably BCP in the IETF. > > Best > -- > Dr. Heiner Wolf > wolf.heiner@gmail.com > www.wolfspelz.de > www.virtual-presence.org > _______________________________________________ > mmox mailing list > mmox@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Charles Krinke
- [mmox] IETF policy question Heiner Wolf
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Mystical Demina
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Heiner Wolf
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Jon Watte
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Morgaine
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Heiner Wolf
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Lisa Dusseault
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [mmox] IETF policy question Dave CROCKER