Re: [mmox] IETF policy question

Hi,

I am not
- suggesting,
- talking about 57 VWs.

I am
- trying to be balanced without implied tendency,
- asking experienced IETF members, e.g. ADs about proven policy.

Best
hw

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Mystical Demina
<MysticalDemina@xrgrid.com> wrote:
> But I think you are wrong about the other 57 platforms out there.  Don't
> they all need to have a teleport location specification so that can jump
> between their own virtual worlds time they are able to interoperate.  And if
> they all move forward using the same specification the foundation is set for
> when a client can interoperate with different virtual worlds.
>
> But more than that, you suggest all 57 virtual worlds wait till they can all
> talk together.  I will suggest to you the market will not wait for that.  To
> me it better to have simple solution and grow it, than have no solution.
>
> But that is my opinion, maybe others feel different.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmox-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmox-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Heiner Wolf
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:20 PM
> To: mmox@ietf.org
> Subject: [mmox] IETF policy question
>
> Hi,
>
> Assumed there are multiple systems with incompatible architecture,
> each sophisticated and with it's own protocols.
> Assumed that we as a WG do not know enough about the general problem space.
> Assumed that there are sub-groups which know enough about their
> problem and have working solutions.
>
> What would the IETF do?
> 1. task one of the sub-groups to standardize one of the
> protocol/architecture variants, although it might leave a large part
> of the community out of the loop, while having at least a hope to
> defeat fragmentation in the future
> ...or...
> 2. do not standardize at IETF level, which might be good for the
> competition of ideas and allows the community to learn more about the
> general problem space, but preserves fragmentation unless the market
> cleans it up.
>
> I am really undecided, but there is probably BCP in the IETF.
>
> Best
> --
> Dr. Heiner Wolf
> wolf.heiner@gmail.com
> www.wolfspelz.de
> www.virtual-presence.org
> _______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list
> mmox@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmox mailing list
> mmox@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmox
>


-- 
Dr. Heiner Wolf
wolf.heiner@gmail.com
www.wolfspelz.de
www.virtual-presence.org