Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 04 February 2016 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EA31A0122 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:58:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQuC7lupNOwv for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe21:29:69:252:207:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCDB1A011D for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 20:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.103]) by resqmta-ch2-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id E4yu1s0032EPM31014yu6z; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 04:58:54 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([73.218.51.154]) by resomta-ch2-07v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id E4yu1s0043KdFy1014yuNT; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 04:58:54 +0000
To: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, mmusic@ietf.org
References: <BBE9739C2C302046BD34B42713A1E2A22E88D533@ESESSMB105.ericsson.se> <565C6CE3.3050007@alum.mit.edu> <565CDF90.7050107@nteczone.com> <565CEA14.2040607@alum.mit.edu> <565CEF7B.7010305@nteczone.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADE16A00@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <56682B96.9020008@alcatel-lucent.com> <56684C13.9030106@alum.mit.edu> <5668F9C1.4040606@nteczone.com> <566903E3.8020108@alum.mit.edu> <566A16D2.1070108@nteczone.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADE22AB4@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <566AEB05.3040501@alum.mit.edu> <56AACC37.8090900@cisco.com> <56AB8596.9090304@alum.mit.edu> <56B12F48.409@cisco.com> <56B25159.70002@alum.mit.edu> <56B28240.7080206@cisco.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <56B2DA8D.2000909@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 23:58:53 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56B28240.7080206@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1454561934; bh=MamFEq+jsvpjCM6hHzT32J/P6eCgelfrB8MiUYeqwZg=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=PajLM0DTjQwWAcS/CT3wzasWHSyyAtxHg39ogB7MUd8ClvZnGvSCTc7wYrAF2DV6M rIEryhZpV+WTGgyJBiQ5oUY2zKFO1Nyj48dJ0+QEDFVvrpyriP0mOIiwEMHeEU8FET /15wW3n6HaLYLeAWjF8M/6WqnIDQ4zevZO4AjPRG6O/tBCQ0dmHp+vTznGuRt16ePI kuGnJvHDHRfOdWHBdcB/2Hnhlog0CTNIKNiDoheOJlrWHH//c5KTNn3VRACMl6dwTq DcGfL5FXmlycSFbYseoGh7wS2GaNSEgx/4+LpskHax+EwRgM/ATUVrg/LD4RzfXY1F eJPA9YQRti7lw==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/1yJzl_YsDnuagqD9zFfQ_VC3t40>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] WGLC for draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 04:58:56 -0000

On 2/3/16 5:42 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:

> I'm not concerned about the IANA part. I agree that *if* we need to
> expliclty specify attribute interactions for "dcsa", then it should be
> part of the IANA registry. What I am not agreeing with at this point is
> that there is indeed a need to explicitly speficy these interactions as
> opposed to relying on a more general algorithmic approach (plus the
> offerer being responsible for generating a valid offer if he wants to
> establish a data channel).

Well, an obvious one is that the protocol(s) the attribute pertains to 
need to be defined to work over data channels.

	Thanks,
	Paul