Re: [MMUSIC] Reference update from 4566 to 4566bis?

Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com> Tue, 05 May 2020 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <fandreas@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24DE93A0763; Tue, 5 May 2020 06:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N0Ny4JlOdCHl; Tue, 5 May 2020 06:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A5433A07E0; Tue, 5 May 2020 06:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7248; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1588684791; x=1589894391; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=NJT6dDB+092Q1RAsbTCp0Armx3DQXz/dGuuzBFOvrVE=; b=FvYCGqfq9apFKp601War0i8WJxsUWZtSoxzUG4roNahLSmwghBTU6eEv VpEpfo9r24H/5BB60NhT61KXbYxLTd/lMBb0d0tIZ90Hw6BLwLM/PSD0o 93ECqyldeR70UBBH4REUGRXykO/opdtoDCuX9uOwjNf/G7Gm4L10jS4rw g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,355,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="747385428"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 05 May 2020 13:19:50 +0000
Received: from [10.118.10.21] (rtp-fandreas-2-8814.cisco.com [10.118.10.21]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 045DJoKQ005147; Tue, 5 May 2020 13:19:50 GMT
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, bfcpbis <bfcpbis-bounces@ietf.org>
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org" <bfcpbis-chairs@ietf.org>, "pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu" <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, Suhas Nandakumar <snandaku@cisco.com>
References: <12B81692-4EA9-4AC2-8F46-DE3E1A39BE8C@ericsson.com>
From: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <f93ff4b8-3485-893c-e2ed-316babf8fe05@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:19:50 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <12B81692-4EA9-4AC2-8F46-DE3E1A39BE8C@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F0EB5794A70DEEC06CDE4BC6"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.118.10.21, rtp-fandreas-2-8814.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/wRCMSQY_DxrTqNFigCCmM3MgNRg>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Reference update from 4566 to 4566bis?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 13:19:59 -0000

Makes sense (as long as none of those references were explicitly to 4566 
rather than 4566bis).

Cheers

-- Flemming (as individual)

On 5/5/20 4:34 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Some of the drafts in Cluster 238 that reference RFC 4566, while other 
> reference draft-4566bis-
>
> Since draft-4566bis is also part of Cluster 238, and is in the RFC 
> editor’s queue, should we update the references to draft-4566bis?
>
> The change would be done **at least** to the following drafts (I will 
> only check the ones I author/co-author):
>
> MMUSIC WG:
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp
>
> BFCPbis:
>
> draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4583bis-27
>
> One of the reason many drafts do not reference 4566bis is because the 
> drafts were going to be finalized long before 4566bis. But, as that is 
> now not the case….
>
> draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-attributes references both 4566 (normative) and 
> 4566bis (informative). In my opinion we could make 4566bis normative 
> there, but I’d like to hear what Suhas thinks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic