Re: [Monami6] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-bagnulo-shim6-mip-00.txt

[marcelo bagnulo braun <[e-mail]>]

El 26/07/2005, a las 11:01, Thierry Ernst escribió:
...

>  The issues we want to solve would
> be the very straight forward extensions to MIP6 and NEMO. For the other
> issues, we just want to explain them correctly and to identify possible
> solutions or WGs. This is where the interaction between Shim6 and MIP6
> is very much concerned.
>

Well, my understanding was that the proposed work was to solve the host 
multihoming problem, in particular the issues described in 
draft-montavont-mobileip-multihoming-pb-statement.
In order to address the issues presented in this draft, much more than 
registering multiple CoAs is needed, i am afraid.
In particular, supporting multiple HoAs will require considerable 
modifications in the CN AFAICT. Now, the shim seems to provide some of 
the required features for supporting multiple HoAs, and its deployment 
will also imply modifying the CNs. So, i guess that only becuase of 
deployment configurations, it makes much sense to try to explore 
whether the shim is useful, just in order to avoid two modifications of 
all the installed base.



> Since next meeting is a BOF to set up a WG, it is not, IMHO, 
> appropriate
> to discuss the interactions between MIP6 and other WGs; what is
> appropriate is to discuss the proposed charter.
>
> Thierry
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Monami6 mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6
>


_______________________________________________
Monami6 mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/monami6