Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs
Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com> Fri, 17 May 2013 05:44 UTC
Return-Path: <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7664F21F924A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w9Lxjw0O7m6F for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:44:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x236.google.com (mail-qa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0CF21F923B for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id hu16so197222qab.13 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=hkdzMQoMkjGLT9G0KQY+54hF9B8dKuDCHeGerJxwTXM=; b=vAIfin6l4C+r0AqWRa9XVyvgVUzD4ILaotjqbhMJXOQcVg4FEGVlZ4XLaBPCIsKTbx ZX00X//e7R1CQenimnnTL7qqnkVDua/nBSlwT3MEvOj9n3R+LSWnzel1PMuD8S2jnUti I1vhqUjWfJnAY3w3j7UPCL4XY3g9iFsiawyqQSHUSdEIVhcbBaBQlcQMBrMxcukYSSYf TBR3loNo53/2vbBLxt5VbwxpOTRLlvOd9oyHAz0/ZYfe6fYh8IBykWrR78XI2qu2tKG1 Ff5JbPkaqARiFw98dfA9Rzz4dqAOdZKxNFTLcE/yqvnxYU3HAHm+bHQIc6H8YQSuL9tV cw2g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.7.195 with SMTP id e3mr35414267qae.5.1368769451323; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.129.162 with HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 22:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 13:44:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CAH==cJy6VWoo0vs2u3R=Pu8q6S4EAm=KWAGyvAODEd5GvKNCXg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lizhong Jin <lizho.jin@gmail.com>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f923b36ed143f04dce37899"
Subject: Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 05:44:14 -0000
Hi, Support, and I like this. But it seems deleting section 3 in RFC5586 is not enough. Other sections in RFC5586 also has the content of ACH TLV. Is it engouth to update by only deleting section 3 described in this draft? Lizhong > > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > ACH TLVs keep popping up and causing Stewart and me trouble. Mainly it is > > about explaining why no-one actually wants to use them (i.e., when each > new > > ACH Type is defined and has a "No TLVs" written for it, we get asked "why > > not?"). > > > > It seems to us that ACH TLVs are an idea that has been rejected. > Initially > > we thought they might be used (especially for identifiers), but there > seems > > to be good opinion that handling generic TLVs would be a pain. > > > > Since I was heavily responsible for insisting that ACH TLVs were included > > in RFC 5586, it seems reasonable that I do the work to fix it. > > > > The I-D below retires ACH TLVs and handles the necessary registry > changes. > > > > Note, of course, that structured data are still possible within > individual > > ACHs if the protocol spec for an individual ACH decides to have them. > > > > We're directing this work to the MPLS working group because that is where > > 5586 was written. I have BCC'ed PWE3, L2VPN, and BFD for information. > > > > Thanks for any comments. > > > > As humble WG contributors we would be enthusiastic to see early WG > > adoption and last call :-) > > > > Thanks, > > Adrian > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > > > Sent: 07 May 2013 17:33 > > > To: Adrian Farrel; Stewart Bryant > > > Subject: New Version Notification for > > draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv- > > > 00.txt > > > > > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-00.txt > > > has been successfully submitted by Adrian Farrel and posted to the > > > IETF repository. > > > > > > Filename: draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv > > > Revision: 00 > > > Title: Retiring TLVs from the Associated Channel Header > > of the MPLS > > > Generic Associated Channel > > > Creation date: 2013-05-07 > > > Group: Individual Submission > > > Number of pages: 4 > > > URL: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire- > > > ach-tlv-00.txt > > > Status: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv > > > Htmlized: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farbryantrel-mpls-retire-ach-tlv-00 > > > > > > > > > Abstract: > > > The MPLS Generic Associated Channel (G-ACh) is a generalization of > > > the applicability of the Pseudowire (PW) Associated Channel Header > > > (ACH). RFC 5586 defines the concept of Type-Length-Variable (TLV) > > > constructs that can be carried in messages on the G-ACh by placing > > > them in the ACH. > > > > > > No Associated Channel Type yet defined uses a TLV. Furthermore, it > > > is believed that handling TLVs in hardware introduces significant > > > problems to the fast-path, and since G-ACh messages are intended to > > > be processed substantially in hardware, the use of TLVs in > > > undesirable. > > > > > > This document updates RFC 5586 by retiring ACH TLVs and removing the > > > associated registry. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mpls mailing list > > mpls@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: < > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/attachments/20130516/f560777c/attachment.htm > > > > ------------------------------ >
- [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Nitin Bahadur
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Giles Heron
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Dan Frost
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Sam Aldrin
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs George Swallow (swallow)
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs David Allan I
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Pablo Frank
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Yaakov Stein
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Lizhong Jin
- Re: [mpls] Retiring ACH TLVs Eric Gray