IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors list (was:Re: Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements]

loa@pi.nu Tue, 02 April 2024 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C813AC14F61A; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LxjbsbrOysU; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F4F8C14F617; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 03:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pi.nu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB883A9685; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:10:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 124.106.198.177 (SquirrelMail authenticated user loa@pi.nu) by pi.nu with HTTP; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:10:12 +0200
Message-ID: <9c2b0e436af4c127cdbb2aa4848d583a.squirrel@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <A9F278C9-7648-49C8-BF46-42C1ACDC18F9@gmail.com>
References: <071e01da749c$d219b030$764d1090$@olddog.co.uk> <076301da7ba3$673652b0$35a2f810$@olddog.co.uk> <056a01da814a$a9c84b90$fd58e2b0$@olddog.co.uk> <CA+RyBmXF7tmsEm+d5d1hrJwV32ASq-32CUixTaCyL3wNr8neeQ@mail.gmail.com> <CD76E5E2-229E-42FA-8585-D40E28FFFF5C@gmail.com> <317d6e0983d16123516d30eec006894f.squirrel@pi.nu> <FBC4E606-A7FA-4E08-BDA0-224180F51BC6@gmail.com> <486c36c65c2167515b6dd06093d62662.squirrel@pi.nu> <A9F278C9-7648-49C8-BF46-42C1ACDC18F9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:10:12 +0200
From: loa@pi.nu
To: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/fANoGXrgdIJEWY4fqmu1umVuwdo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors list (was:Re: Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:10:19 -0000

Acee,

<snip>

>
> LSR is just the working group name and isn’t used in RFC text.


Yes, you are right. I thought we had in RFCs, but the closest I can
come is OLSR, and I won't insist :).

/Loa
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email