[mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements]
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 28 March 2024 20:01 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB81AC14F680; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8Ful9mkpOgF; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D9BC14F619; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 42SK13BO031683; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A620346054; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B8346053; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.140.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 42SK12t6029322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org
References: <071e01da749c$d219b030$764d1090$@olddog.co.uk> <076301da7ba3$673652b0$35a2f810$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <076301da7ba3$673652b0$35a2f810$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:02 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <056a01da814a$a9c84b90$fd58e2b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdqBSqe1S85n4M4MT92SxqvULVzEwA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.140.254
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=QPXHg4rL9IUUAVUcR65MsKBGMbRjqF9NpmjnjXHUfrw=; b=0Rq 4g1WuufYXLGb2Dx1HUKda9EgvHR1gcSfZFODUNyUQ5uQMaryQA2K86JO2oJJ4ETK lCQrTFK/iH9s/yXzALjKVTa6k1tHhKTY/rkKQ0LLWqEbWu7KK4xQhpSkSmZ9aJgH oJ0TiDwdia32ad6s0tI3nYGgwGoNOL78awpc2vFieHss+4r1BVknBKwWwlvfpDSS 0aBHLP0LyJO0syf27TRCrta6y2C8e0mWT3vShWExVVLp2xGrtkciuCcyBhPJ54pY gyy61xKa7iYX9Jmj3vm/Mv4UIYMIqIZU3lrsrheZhOpH6PE44ML9lo8HNXMPTuSF PL6oVBDuR6ec8b8dcLw==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28280.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.376-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--16.376-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28280.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--16.376200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: DuEHWhS17/z0d2KBPeDt5rT2H4BSd5GPaBTWjXFXXd8sTMNBTJAZWTrp awL+KMwrxdoKBmqoC6aR6kWIMTgaZXQ2cLAjeUlNzNY33yIEF4YZskwWqoib3DGQt2RbsLmqoK5 PQ1jUmcRFhtKHemq9olqbc0EnIy/d9JLMCR5S9Sr6zT5BlgBw3+9Bi8r8zoNMg8mVW3QEoZ2S7B 5B84JGA/rvsV1TtS1Agc0kqnflEUkfbrSl8hZc98OC5QFrchIlnOKnAp7gl7WXmcBsB0zEVM8Oa lpDJEQlnhsyulONNpCd6Lv9qI8wH2hRNh1jh9z7jrVn4cme+w508mvrcp5AxNkKZvhUx4/TkW2o oQJksHfsrPBW1abg2H41niV9KymzTX7PJ/OU3vL+xOhjarOnHis3zPQeiEbe+gtHj7OwNO0CpgE TeT0ynA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/tJYP8X0goki1pk662NDyU65zTcI>
Subject: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:14 -0000
I'm kind of giving you all a ticking clock reminder. Of course, I'm no longer a WG chair, so I won't be calling consensus on this, but I will be answering the shepherd write-up question that asks what the consensus was like on this document. If, as the general noise on the list implies, people care about MNA, then commenting during this last call seems important. Cheers, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 21 March 2024 15:21 To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements Hi all, I know it is IETF week and you all have other things to do (nice meals, sight-seeing, combatting jet-lag), but I just wanted to remind you to look at this document and make your comments about the last call. With last calls, silence generally means no support! Best, Adrian -----Original Message----- From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: 12 March 2024 16:46 To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org> Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org Subject: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements This email starts a second MPLS working group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements. (You may recall that the first last call produced a lot of discussion and issues that Matthew, as editor, has worked valiantly to resolve.) Please re-review the document (it has changed a lot since last time) and express an opinion on the list. - Is the document complete? - Does it contain any errors? - Is it ready to move forward for publication as an Informational RFC? There is no IPR disclosed against this document or its predecessors. All authors, contributors, and active working group participants are reminded of their responsibilities under BCP 79. This last call will run for three weeks (covering the IETF period). It will end at 17.00 UTC on Tuesday 2nd April (narrowly avoiding ending on 1st April and confusing us all). Thanks, Adrian (for the MPLS chairs) _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Greg Mirsky
- [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working G… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Acee Lindem
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Tony Li
- [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors list (w… loa
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Joel Halpern
- Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors lis… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors lis… Acee Lindem
- Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors lis… loa
- Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors lis… Acee Lindem
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Rakesh Gandhi
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… loa
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] * abbreviations in the RFC Editors lis… loa
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Tony Li
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Andrew Alston
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… John Drake
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Igor Malyushkin
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Igor Malyushkin
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… John Drake
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Worki… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-i… Andrew Alston