[mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements]

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 28 March 2024 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB81AC14F680; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R8Ful9mkpOgF; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D9BC14F619; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 42SK13BO031683; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 GMT
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A620346054; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B8346053; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.140.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 42SK12t6029322 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:03 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org
References: <071e01da749c$d219b030$764d1090$@olddog.co.uk> <076301da7ba3$673652b0$35a2f810$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <076301da7ba3$673652b0$35a2f810$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:02 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <056a01da814a$a9c84b90$fd58e2b0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdqBSqe1S85n4M4MT92SxqvULVzEwA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.140.254
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=QPXHg4rL9IUUAVUcR65MsKBGMbRjqF9NpmjnjXHUfrw=; b=0Rq 4g1WuufYXLGb2Dx1HUKda9EgvHR1gcSfZFODUNyUQ5uQMaryQA2K86JO2oJJ4ETK lCQrTFK/iH9s/yXzALjKVTa6k1tHhKTY/rkKQ0LLWqEbWu7KK4xQhpSkSmZ9aJgH oJ0TiDwdia32ad6s0tI3nYGgwGoNOL78awpc2vFieHss+4r1BVknBKwWwlvfpDSS 0aBHLP0LyJO0syf27TRCrta6y2C8e0mWT3vShWExVVLp2xGrtkciuCcyBhPJ54pY gyy61xKa7iYX9Jmj3vm/Mv4UIYMIqIZU3lrsrheZhOpH6PE44ML9lo8HNXMPTuSF PL6oVBDuR6ec8b8dcLw==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28280.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--16.376-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--16.376-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28280.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--16.376200-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: DuEHWhS17/z0d2KBPeDt5rT2H4BSd5GPaBTWjXFXXd8sTMNBTJAZWTrp awL+KMwrxdoKBmqoC6aR6kWIMTgaZXQ2cLAjeUlNzNY33yIEF4YZskwWqoib3DGQt2RbsLmqoK5 PQ1jUmcRFhtKHemq9olqbc0EnIy/d9JLMCR5S9Sr6zT5BlgBw3+9Bi8r8zoNMg8mVW3QEoZ2S7B 5B84JGA/rvsV1TtS1Agc0kqnflEUkfbrSl8hZc98OC5QFrchIlnOKnAp7gl7WXmcBsB0zEVM8Oa lpDJEQlnhsyulONNpCd6Lv9qI8wH2hRNh1jh9z7jrVn4cme+w508mvrcp5AxNkKZvhUx4/TkW2o oQJksHfsrPBW1abg2H41niV9KymzTX7PJ/OU3vL+xOhjarOnHis3zPQeiEbe+gtHj7OwNO0CpgE TeT0ynA==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/tJYP8X0goki1pk662NDyU65zTcI>
Subject: [mpls] Do you care about MNA? [Was: 2nd Working Group Last call on draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 20:01:14 -0000

I'm kind of giving you all a ticking clock reminder.

Of course, I'm no longer a WG chair, so I won't be calling consensus on
this, but I will be answering the shepherd write-up question that asks what
the consensus was like on this document.

If, as the general noise on the list implies, people care about MNA, then
commenting during this last call seems important.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 21 March 2024 15:21
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements

Hi all,

I know it is IETF week and you all have other things to do (nice meals,
sight-seeing, combatting jet-lag), but I just wanted to remind you to look
at this document and make your comments about the last call.

With last calls, silence generally means no support!

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 12 March 2024 16:46
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] 2nd Working Group Last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements

This email starts a second MPLS working group last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements.

(You may recall that the first last call produced a lot of discussion and
issues that Matthew, as editor, has worked valiantly to resolve.)

Please re-review the document (it has changed a lot since last time) and
express an opinion on the list. 
- Is the document complete?
- Does it contain any errors?
- Is it ready to move forward for publication as an Informational RFC?

There is no IPR disclosed against this document or its predecessors. All
authors, contributors, and active working group participants are reminded of
their responsibilities under BCP 79.

This last call will run for three weeks (covering the IETF period). It will
end at 17.00 UTC on Tuesday 2nd April (narrowly avoiding ending on 1st April
and confusing us all).

Thanks,
Adrian (for the MPLS chairs)

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls