Re: [Netconf] WG LC for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835E212953B for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 14:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kN78cMgouo2o for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 May 2017 14:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x234.google.com (mail-pg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1387D12783A for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 May 2017 14:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x234.google.com with SMTP id o3so929556pgn.2 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 May 2017 14:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=xZmLs7i3JW4C2T7zPctacxwRfQECPaRSO3eGRTFQ6vU=; b=HAWYxBHVasQKptDr1IwHTBWd7beW7bqPFX8YiT6NVLSSxjPbHO0wCzd4YoRREWUZ2M XwewYAL5GBQkm0x5ka1yWUuRrFN+DXf/Y8TStvhQfphwQo3ouKrgJqj405kO8T4zBKQb wYxTNhsSIKzFv8pNBLWX44DJIovIdB9dZIv1Q8gG2iPsUj05BehBXs8kaWSDdEgMQU6C /GUFg9JNHW+U9HkFbuQzJer+HwaxCvudOumX9V9/Jtaizy1DRfJBDpE6L0HxQa5HCEM+ Y8MTtGiKyTMV8Ro/dhCQNzH3meey3iCLEOqPlhWOo6fEvM3p1evBKA9zK6/E2MPfepeb iEPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to; bh=xZmLs7i3JW4C2T7zPctacxwRfQECPaRSO3eGRTFQ6vU=; b=DlQRdjdzh+w3MMonBTq/l5XPJ7GtKaucpz3/Lpr/+MnphGl5sLx1k+EGZgcZdW3IMJ BQb+9qnhStDhq3pm6r5jXpWRWLVbJfFF0GZwQiyWPOydfA5Uil+SeK2jtlPLPjGSso05 SG0GCpY66Ki0B8zy/2hNro1ZZjvRh8lFGc7m3j8kU5LL78AwOKn7mZ0pWQGQR06DQyz/ LVc7KSCI1J6qYZpnY9sPAusI3F4mVtWBfexWAN7NIjv9wTLVywM7oaYLWhb+elqAFGBS bl05Jb73vCo9ARchqcemtuWTU6dsGahSmugBcYOifck3DtkrjmZJdPFiWesmYsH5kjJb wxvA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7ovTf9DCAwQvGE7W5Yc56y2OAZ3ODFNI9MwJsTdtdUYGrOshJL yjYSMzGokCwyY9If5UQ=
X-Received: by 10.84.213.2 with SMTP id f2mr32891107pli.22.1493846293469; Wed, 03 May 2017 14:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.154.160.10] ([128.107.241.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16sm164608pgc.4.2017.05.03.14.18.12 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 03 May 2017 14:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5511D996-D337-4029-A639-1AA81132BBBD"
Message-Id: <E236AC6C-4B6D-43B1-8092-0B8AA3F4D6AA@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 14:18:12 -0700
References: <A13E62FA-AB96-4164-98D5-3CC1D04A78E8@gmail.com>
To: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A13E62FA-AB96-4164-98D5-3CC1D04A78E8@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/5AVm192JGR12rDzbtzMspLPBvIU>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG LC for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 21:20:18 -0000

Folks,

There has been literally no feedback on this document, either to say they have read the document and support it, or to express concerns about the document. Silence, unfortunately is not a good guide for us. To move the document forward, we need to hear from folks, including those who were in IETF 98.

Thanks.

> On Apr 18, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> NETCONF WG,
> 
> In IETF 98, the authors indicated that the above draft was ready for Last Call, and the consensus in the room indicated as much.
> 
> This is a start of a 2 week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis. After two weeks, the document will be assigned a shepherd, and the document will be prepared for IESG.
> 
> The latest version of the draft can be found at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-01 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-01>
> 
> Please review and send any comments to the WG mailing list or by responding to this e-mail. Comments can be statements such as, I read/reviewed the document and believe it is ready for publication, or I have concerns about the document. For the latter, please indicate what your concerns are. 
> 
> Any reports on implementation status or plans to implement are also very useful.
> 
> Authors, please indicate if you are aware of any IPRs related to the draft.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Mahesh and Mehmet
> 
> 

Mahesh & Mehmet