Re: [Netconf] WG LC for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis

Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75A61293F3 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8DWEXQPrcXDt for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27131128768 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w64so68948209wma.0 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WhrBxQPmsZIsh9l/A85l0ZmPQkIXNCRBPgyFOt1zZh0=; b=Us7FBS9WPLN81ZgOvmGkqe8a/hchwBF16+qIyQBWwyiHsEAtbGwfkUHrtc+lwTZyiF v5uxGFLGvhQ/WsmDLhKgiGmDTVTXvyl0CdrwjbOR2/oLgy2cwf5iup08n0NTgERLdV9G iDDXEtT12OgS2AjKTkhXcujdyIcgcBai5VHym5kF4XdEIqArM0+NCyqMUVKhGuTzBdsA ITbGFxL7j7k3J7FeIZq5YOLy2FIoCnDpf2ynlYuXfD2kXlK/kgxC7m/bAUQc4t6G86fq Wgb6eju90yYEG+h4Gabh4dwkDsMzGCo4Hx/OaUVnAJxcXqW7krxwrLe/oaF7Y+fv0vBF beGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WhrBxQPmsZIsh9l/A85l0ZmPQkIXNCRBPgyFOt1zZh0=; b=QSJ9DFvIv0Pvr/laOOF5q/t0gKZY8bLvGhJWGGJzLE0XFwBE/vX73ozzjoTvv4am3X wd5cxOAVJGEDwgJogo6A4R4Ya6fazdCFso8fy5CYbZH3stmXc1KR2jLJYJvOxYDg6xAT 1dBKwYLhfltrU3pbyIhHmvly6x3UADGZmQ+tRSzWLsRm8ub/ajY04+SJOEHQuT2yzvbX 7hFbDRf6QBbf2glvbI8X6ET5eLh7nSEGpx6SUPOHfIFfql2Auj1A9Ff0XIasMdTj9ZW9 k2LjRZiUp+Z/a7E865+/4uPDt0C4oGBL5OFGUFXPJ/zf4C/+DStjvzoAXCdzeNEjmmBw +unw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7/HAsJxvHaa+5EN1yVZ1iEETB3HRyzAvW+wtdq86tKo6a1QjK6 cUlQ2aqQYU5Bjx9X8QuindyGC6m4lw==
X-Received: by 10.28.46.213 with SMTP id u204mr518308wmu.136.1492565627573; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.139.23 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A13E62FA-AB96-4164-98D5-3CC1D04A78E8@gmail.com>
References: <A13E62FA-AB96-4164-98D5-3CC1D04A78E8@gmail.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:33:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHSrGG17TgzQcm-Awsmj_UGO0chVM6jp51V4VCgSEueU3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11497ace092d8c054d7b04b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/Z5S5zGsnHqQF7VuflkjVuQcg8TA>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WG LC for draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 01:33:51 -0000

Hi,

Note this issue on github that is already fixed in the next release:
https://github.com/netconf-wg/rfc6536bis/issues/1


Andy


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <
mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:

> NETCONF WG,
>
> In IETF 98, the authors indicated that the above draft was ready for Last
> Call, and the consensus in the room indicated as much.
>
> This is a start of a 2 week WG Last Call for
> draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis. After two weeks, the document will be
> assigned a shepherd, and the document will be prepared for IESG.
>
> The latest version of the draft can be found at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-01
>
> Please review and send any comments to the WG mailing list or by
> responding to this e-mail. Comments can be statements such as, I
> read/reviewed the document and believe it is ready for publication, or I
> have concerns about the document. For the latter, please indicate what your
> concerns are.
>
> Any reports on implementation status or plans to implement are also very
> useful.
>
> Authors, please indicate if you are aware of any IPRs related to the draft.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Mahesh and Mehmet
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
>
>