Re: [Netconf] Finished WG LastCall fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt

OK, Thanks Kent, that is a clearer statement (at least in my ears/reading).

Bert
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kent Watsen" <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>; "netconf" 
<netconf@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Finished WG LastCall 
fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt

> Just to be clear, I didn't say to abandon it.  I just said it wasn't an 
> important problem to Juniper, which is why I was neither supporting or 
> not-supporting it.  Same as in the WG meeting in Quebec, I neither raised my 
> hand in favor or against it...
>
> Thanks,
> Kent
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 11:51 AM
> To: netconf
> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call 
> fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
>
>> - The comments from Kent Watson ("abandon this I-D and this work, it
> is
>>     not needed") was already brought up when we started/chartered the
> work.
>>     Nobody seems to have picked up on that and so Kent seems to be the
>>     lonely dissenter in this case. So I consider this matter closed
>>     and I read WG consensus that the WG DOES want to finish and
> standardize
>>     this work.
>
> This is also my understanding.
>
> Mehmet
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of
>> ext Bert (IETF) Wijnen
>> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:17 AM
>> To: netconf
>> Subject: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-
>> control-04.txt
>>
>> My quick evaluation as co-chair:
>>
>> - quite a set of good comments/concerns from various reviewers
>>     will be addressed by editors/authors in a new revision
>> - we got a commitment from our Securoty Advisor (Tim Polk) that he
> will
>> review
>>     as well and give us feedback. If he is timely, then authors will
> address
>> his
>>     comments in new revision. If not, then he will review the next
> revision
>> - The comments from Kent Watson ("abandon this I-D and this work, it
> is
>>     not needed") was already brought up when we started/chartered the
> work.
>>     Nobody seems to have picked up on that and so Kent seems to be the
>>     lonely dissenter in this case. So I consider this matter closed
>>     and I read WG consensus that the WG DOES want to finish and
> standardize
>>     this work.
>>
>> Bert (speaking as co-chair)
>>
>> On 8/4/11 9:11 AM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote:
>> > We did not get any requests for extension of the WGLC end date.
>> > So WGLC has ended for this document.
>> >
>> > The authors will address all comments with a new revision.
>> >
>> > Bert and Mehmet
>> >
>> > On 7/29/11 6:31 PM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote:
>> >> WG participants,
>> >>
>> >> Pls review BEFORE or BY August 1 if you have not already done so.
>> >> A "I read it and see no issues or have no concerns" is also very
> welcome!
>> >>
>> >> I case you need a couple of days extra time (and commit a date for
>> >> your review), we're willing to consider a short extension.
>> >>
>> >> Bert and Mehmet
>> >>
>> >> -------- Original Message --------
>> >> Subject:     [Netconf] WG Last Call for
> draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-
>> 04.txt
>> >> Date:     Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:53:24 +0200
>> >> From:     Bert (IETF) Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
>> >> To:     netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Dear WG participants,
>> >>
>> >> This document was published mid-June, and we have not had much
> comments
>> >> sofar. So we conclude it must be ready for WG Last Call.
>> >>
>> >> This is a formal WG Last call for
> draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
>> >> Please review and send any comments BEFORE August 1.
>> >> Best would be if you can send it BEFORE July 24, so that we can
> discuss
>> >> any open issues during our Netconf session at IETF81 in Quebec.
>> >>
>> >> Bert and Mehmet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Netconf mailing list
>> Netconf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf 