Re: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 15:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB4521F8B47 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.875
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.875 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.724, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nk0msw9ZpRqc for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC5121F8B36 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 08:50:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p74Fp6Z8001159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:51:06 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.94]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p74Fp3AW006457; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:51:06 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.18]) by DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 4 Aug 2011 17:50:54 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 17:50:53 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6402752B18@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E3A4757.3000601@bwijnen.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
thread-index: AcxSdnlfY9gD1GpOQvCAWAuEp1F36gAR6CuA
References: <4E1DB164.5090007@bwijnen.net> <4E32E057.7030707@bwijnen.net><4E3A4605.2030009@bwijnen.net> <4E3A4757.3000601@bwijnen.net>
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Aug 2011 15:50:54.0447 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B1EB7F0:01CC52BE]
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 15:50:53 -0000
> - The comments from Kent Watson ("abandon this I-D and this work, it is > not needed") was already brought up when we started/chartered the work. > Nobody seems to have picked up on that and so Kent seems to be the > lonely dissenter in this case. So I consider this matter closed > and I read WG consensus that the WG DOES want to finish and standardize > this work. This is also my understanding. Mehmet > -----Original Message----- > From: netconf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > ext Bert (IETF) Wijnen > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:17 AM > To: netconf > Subject: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf-netconf-access- > control-04.txt > > My quick evaluation as co-chair: > > - quite a set of good comments/concerns from various reviewers > will be addressed by editors/authors in a new revision > - we got a commitment from our Securoty Advisor (Tim Polk) that he will > review > as well and give us feedback. If he is timely, then authors will address > his > comments in new revision. If not, then he will review the next revision > - The comments from Kent Watson ("abandon this I-D and this work, it is > not needed") was already brought up when we started/chartered the work. > Nobody seems to have picked up on that and so Kent seems to be the > lonely dissenter in this case. So I consider this matter closed > and I read WG consensus that the WG DOES want to finish and standardize > this work. > > Bert (speaking as co-chair) > > On 8/4/11 9:11 AM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote: > > We did not get any requests for extension of the WGLC end date. > > So WGLC has ended for this document. > > > > The authors will address all comments with a new revision. > > > > Bert and Mehmet > > > > On 7/29/11 6:31 PM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote: > >> WG participants, > >> > >> Pls review BEFORE or BY August 1 if you have not already done so. > >> A "I read it and see no issues or have no concerns" is also very welcome! > >> > >> I case you need a couple of days extra time (and commit a date for > >> your review), we're willing to consider a short extension. > >> > >> Bert and Mehmet > >> > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control- > 04.txt > >> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:53:24 +0200 > >> From: Bert (IETF) Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net> > >> To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org> > >> > >> > >> > >> Dear WG participants, > >> > >> This document was published mid-June, and we have not had much comments > >> sofar. So we conclude it must be ready for WG Last Call. > >> > >> This is a formal WG Last call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt > >> Please review and send any comments BEFORE August 1. > >> Best would be if you can send it BEFORE July 24, so that we can discuss > >> any open issues during our Netconf session at IETF81 in Quebec. > >> > >> Bert and Mehmet > > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > Netconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf
- [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-acc… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- Re: [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-n… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Andy Bierman
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Wes Hardaker
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Andy Bierman
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Kent Watsen
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ie… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call for draft-ietf-ne… Bert (IETF) Wijnen
- Re: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call fordraft-ietf… Kent Watsen
- Re: [Netconf] Finished WG LastCall fordraft-ietf-… Bert Wijnen (IETF)