Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt

"Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Thu, 04 August 2011 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E210F11E80AA for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkVxICNPMbeE for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1341]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062ED21F8A7E for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1Qos57-0003Lf-NT for netconf@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:11:03 +0200
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=BWMACBOOK.local) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1Qos57-0006Fm-IU for netconf@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:11:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4E3A4605.2030009@bwijnen.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:11:01 +0200
From: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <4E1DB164.5090007@bwijnen.net> <4E32E057.7030707@bwijnen.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E32E057.7030707@bwijnen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4a360e959f23dc8de74994a0e0072adb9
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:10:56 -0000

We did not get any requests for extension of the WGLC end date.
So WGLC has ended for this document.

The authors will address all comments with a new revision.

Bert and Mehmet

On 7/29/11 6:31 PM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote:
> WG participants,
>
> Pls review BEFORE or BY August 1 if you have not already done so.
> A "I read it and see no issues or have no concerns" is also very welcome!
>
> I case you need a couple of days extra time (and commit a date for
> your review), we're willing to consider a short extension.
>
> Bert and Mehmet
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:     [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
> Date:     Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:53:24 +0200
> From:     Bert (IETF) Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
> To:     netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
>
>
>
> Dear WG participants,
>
> This document was published mid-June, and we have not had much comments
> sofar. So we conclude it must be ready for WG Last Call.
>
> This is a formal WG Last call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
> Please review and send any comments BEFORE August 1.
> Best would be if you can send it BEFORE July 24, so that we can discuss
> any open issues during our Netconf session at IETF81 in Quebec.
>
> Bert and Mehmet
>
>