[Netconf] Finished WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt

"Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Thu, 04 August 2011 07:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F11311E8089 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:16:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4oJspLeL-VrB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postlady.ripe.net (postlady.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1341]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312A221F8B63 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 00:16:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dodo.ripe.net ([193.0.23.4]) by postlady.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1QosAa-0003SX-25 for netconf@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:16:41 +0200
Received: from dog.ripe.net ([193.0.1.217] helo=BWMACBOOK.local) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1QosAZ-0006aw-MX for netconf@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:16:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4E3A4757.3000601@bwijnen.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:16:39 +0200
From: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <4E1DB164.5090007@bwijnen.net> <4E32E057.7030707@bwijnen.net> <4E3A4605.2030009@bwijnen.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E3A4605.2030009@bwijnen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -2.9 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 86ab03e524994f79ca2c75a176445dd4344abe7805509dcaf80565b7f4a1eeab
Subject: [Netconf] Finished WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 07:16:29 -0000

My quick evaluation as co-chair:

- quite a set of good comments/concerns from various reviewers
    will be addressed by editors/authors in a new revision
- we got a commitment from our Securoty Advisor (Tim Polk) that he will review
    as well and give us feedback. If he is timely, then authors will address his
    comments in new revision. If not, then he will review the next revision
- The comments from Kent Watson ("abandon this I-D and this work, it is
    not needed") was already brought up when we started/chartered the work.
    Nobody seems to have picked up on that and so Kent seems to be the
    lonely dissenter in this case. So I consider this matter closed
    and I read WG consensus that the WG DOES want to finish and standardize
    this work.

Bert (speaking as co-chair)

On 8/4/11 9:11 AM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote:
> We did not get any requests for extension of the WGLC end date.
> So WGLC has ended for this document.
>
> The authors will address all comments with a new revision.
>
> Bert and Mehmet
>
> On 7/29/11 6:31 PM, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote:
>> WG participants,
>>
>> Pls review BEFORE or BY August 1 if you have not already done so.
>> A "I read it and see no issues or have no concerns" is also very welcome!
>>
>> I case you need a couple of days extra time (and commit a date for
>> your review), we're willing to consider a short extension.
>>
>> Bert and Mehmet
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:     [Netconf] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
>> Date:     Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:53:24 +0200
>> From:     Bert (IETF) Wijnen <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
>> To:     netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear WG participants,
>>
>> This document was published mid-June, and we have not had much comments
>> sofar. So we conclude it must be ready for WG Last Call.
>>
>> This is a formal WG Last call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
>> Please review and send any comments BEFORE August 1.
>> Best would be if you can send it BEFORE July 24, so that we can discuss
>> any open issues during our Netconf session at IETF81 in Quebec.
>>
>> Bert and Mehmet