IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt

Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com> Mon, 01 August 2011 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@andybierman.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AE021F8C7D for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vscCdpFa9RpC for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (omr5.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D0721F8C74 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr7 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr5.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p71LIUT5031148 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 17:18:30 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr7 smtp.user=andy@andybierman.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: andy@andybierman.com
Received: from [75.84.164.152] ([75.84.164.152:43724] helo=[192.168.0.146]) by cm-omr7 (envelope-from <ietf@andybierman.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 7A/29-15811-528173E4; Mon, 01 Aug 2011 17:18:30 -0400
Message-ID: <4E371822.3050409@andybierman.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 14:18:26 -0700
From: Andy Bierman <ietf@andybierman.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
References: <4E1DB164.5090007@bwijnen.net> <4E32E057.7030707@bwijnen.net> <sd7h6xayhl.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <4E36D86A.5010903@andybierman.com> <sdtya0kf6f.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
In-Reply-To: <sdtya0kf6f.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Tim Polk <tim.polk@nist.gov>, netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Reminder: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netconf-access-control-04.txt
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netconf>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 21:18:24 -0000

On 08/01/2011 02:14 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>
> AB>  The normative text will be moved from the objectives section,
> AB>  but a separate draft for objectives is already out of scope.
>
> Just make sure it's *really* clear that you're defining ACM requirements
> in the same document as you're defining an ACM itself.
>

OK -- that is the plan.

> AB>  This was resolved at the WG meeting and will be finalized in the
> AB>  next rev.
>
> FYI, I should have mentioned I had to miss both the netconf and netmod
> meetings because of conflicts with real paid work (which always has to
> take priority).  Sorry if I've mentioned things that were already
> mentioned there.

Well it would have helped to have a f2f discussion on these issues,
even in the hallway.  At least you read the draft on one of your flights.


Andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email