Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13

"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 11 October 2018 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA9C130EBB for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:41:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0JwUfI-S7Ea for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 503FB130EB8 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2335; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1539276101; x=1540485701; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=W+WIkJifvBM4peZjHFtNCV9cGGv3Fij/x27vKrFtLDY=; b=D4qpGgw5Go+znxDQu/LsHDshWK7hAuogzffi9+d3huZvdgd2YWOE4w3T HoOcAI4mtXCB4H9jLNDp4KK7VMpoDGj09J1IiRs6P6es+Jqcmb2oWDAwI HMkM6Tjc79BB/AWxnGNyC4osTmzOGSalvRWnc5RWVSuOyq3b8etway1cv E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AQAABLfL9b/4wNJK1ZBgMZAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBAYFUAQEBAQEBCwGBWSpmfzKYN4INlxSBZgsBAR+ETQKEVSE3Cg0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIU5AQEBAQIBOj0CBQkCAgEIDgIFAw0REBsXJQIEDg2CTUsBgXkIp1uJVgUFi0AXgUE/gRKDEoRUEgI3JoURAp4QCQKQSh+QEZVrAhEUgSUzIoFVcBWDKIY1ih+MBYEfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,369,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="464901026"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Oct 2018 16:41:40 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9BGfdFQ007375 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:41:40 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:41:39 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:41:39 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13
Thread-Index: AQHUYHm1PmFXMfKNSkqeZJpjJKWPMKUYhW+wgAFj44CAAAQqgIAASHawgABMRwD//74ocA==
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:41:39 +0000
Message-ID: <04bac2b6af86439aa785d95354b1eaff@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <C25DFAF6-04FC-44B4-B714-D6CE4E4EFF8C@juniper.net> <20181010.111455.977252154629241283.mbj@tail-f.com> <c8115971cd7c42909dba9946ef56ebcf@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20181011.092539.1869235859078328014.mbj@tail-f.com> <20181011074033.nvoji4wm66jcryzs@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <fe8362542f89441d987e938617b2de3d@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <20181011163254.csnxrjbyhwoqk2f5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
In-Reply-To: <20181011163254.csnxrjbyhwoqk2f5@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.153, xch-rtp-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/ziSoIQi5jE0ILmI9FR3fjvIIoTM>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 16:41:44 -0000

> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 11, 2018 12:33 PM
> 
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 04:13:15PM +0000, Eric Voit (evoit) wrote:
> > Hi Juergen,
> >
> > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder, October 11, 2018 3:41 AM
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > But this illustrates a problem with SN; the "transport" leaf
> > > > > > is mandatory if the feature "configured" is supported.  The
> > > > > > problem is that just b/c a server supports the "configured"
> > > > > > feature, it doesn't mean that there is an identity defined for
> > > > > > all transports; e.g., there is no identity defined for
> > > > > > NETCONF.  So the leaf "transport" should probably not be mandatory.
> > > > >
> > > > > Made optional within the SN grouping "subscription-policy", and
> > > > > tweaked the definition as follows:
> > > > >
> > > > >     leaf transport {
> > > > >       if-feature "configured";
> > > > >       type transport;
> > > > >       description
> > > > >         "For a configured subscription, this leaf specifies the
> > > > >         transport used to deliver messages destined to all receivers
> > > > >         of that subscription.";
> > > > >     }
> > >
> > > The fix does not seem to address the question nor do I understand
> > > how a configured unspecified transport will work.
> >
> > An unspecified configured transport cannot work without leaf transport
> populated.  That is why there is a refinement to the definition for the Data
> Node which appends to the description above: "This object is mandatory  for
> subscriptions in the configuration datastore."
> >
> 
> The original statement was "there is no identity defined for NETCONF".
> So is there a defined transport identity for NETCONF or not?

There is not.   

This identity was extracted from a previous version of SN to a new model in NETCONF-Notif earlier in the year.  When we subsequently removed configured subscription support from the NETCONF-Notif draft, we removed the identity.

Eric

> /js
> 
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>