Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13
"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Tue, 09 October 2018 20:01 UTC
Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58184130DC4 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.956
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.956 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vFRlDiFO31E6 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A14A130DC1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6106; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1539115304; x=1540324904; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=TuvP55UJjTJikAR+LBIV7BGqbWalG4RQE/4ike2adXc=; b=lQisZSx9daHZcXVB0YI/1gdrshSpybQQpRPTTthSTLOCm2FnevRRsLXL D3EGDtShd/qhxnZ0/clgxN4s4VxnydS3UsroqARGDYp1aa8oExje00Ruf 2eZMD+rEHPgsvyNNJk0uk4N/25GCGVWDyzz7DPN5qMhNxFvufmeXheA4u o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AYAACDCL1b/4ENJK1jGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAQGBUgMBAQEBAQsBgVsqZn8oCoNrlEmCDYM9kzIUgWYLAQEYC4QDRgIXhCMhNQwNAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFOQEBAQECAQEBIREzBwkHBwQCAQgRBAEBAQICCR0CAgIlCxUICAIEARIIgk5LAYF5CA+lOYEuhDMHhV0FgQuKLheBQT+BEoMSgxsBAQIBAYEqARIBBy+CaoJXAokFixOJXgkChk2Jcx+Pf4wpiScCERSBJR8DM2RxcBU7gmyLF4U+b4oUgR+BHwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,361,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="183170953"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Oct 2018 20:01:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (xch-rtp-003.cisco.com [64.101.220.143]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w99K1gUa027796 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Oct 2018 20:01:43 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) by XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (64.101.220.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 16:01:41 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ([64.101.220.153]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Tue, 9 Oct 2018 16:01:42 -0400
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" <rrahman@cisco.com>, Balázs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13
Thread-Index: AQHUXKVcPmFXMfKNSkqeZJpjJKWPMKUQsLZQgAbcp4D//83TUA==
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:01:41 +0000
Message-ID: <915e9f38bebf464383f2273b4c5b9a19@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com>
References: <C25DFAF6-04FC-44B4-B714-D6CE4E4EFF8C@juniper.net> <96fe39ed-1c72-15af-d52e-bded07405c50@ericsson.com> <8171584bfe5d4f4e9dfd761a5da65c51@XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com> <7ED63307-4B2C-4376-B64B-8D6FF3FA06D8@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7ED63307-4B2C-4376-B64B-8D6FF3FA06D8@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.56.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.143, xch-rtp-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/QC1vjrr0CCdO59keE2o2LtAYzDw>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2018 20:01:47 -0000
Hi Reshad, Thanks. Thoughts in-line... > -----Original Message----- > From: Reshad Rahman (rrahman) > Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 2:57 PM > To: Eric Voit (evoit) <evoit@cisco.com>; Balázs Lengyel > <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>; Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>; > netconf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13 > > Hi, > > I believe the document is ready to progress. I agree with the comments from > Balazs on Sections 3 and 5, except that I think keeping the past paragraph in > section 3 is worthwhile since it's a clarification. > All my comments are nits: > - Section 4 last sentence, s/in that draft/in that document/ updated > - Figure 8 s/with Hint/with hint/ updated > - A.3 Closing ) not needed? removed > - A.3.1 s/might be sent if over NETCONF if/might be sent over NETCONF if/ Updated. Thanks again! Eric > Regards, > Reshad. > > On 2018-10-05, 10:13 AM, "Netconf on behalf of Eric Voit (evoit)" <netconf- > bounces@ietf.org on behalf of evoit@cisco.com> wrote: > > Thanks Balazs. Requested tweaks in Ch3 & Ch5 made. > > Eric > > > From Balázs Lengyel, October 5, 2018 8:17 AM > > > > Hello, > > > > I have reviewed the draft and I think it is ready to progress forward. > > > > Some comments minor: > > > > Generally I find the draft a bit too long and too detailed. Much of this can > be > > derived from the yang language, subscribed-notifications and yang-push. > > Still I can accept it; it is OK. > > > > Ch 3) > > > > s/is been received/has been received/ > > Last paragraph) true, but to me this seems trivial. If you don't support > > something, don't advertise it. Still this does not harm anyone. > > > > CH 5) > > > > s/if the NETCONF session involved with the "establish-subscription" > > terminates,/ if the NETCONF session that carried the "establish- > subscription" > > terminates/ s/RPC MUST be sent using same the NETCONF session/RPC > MUST > > be sent using the same NETCONF session/ > > > > regards Balazs > > > > On 10/5/2018 12:10 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > This message starts a Last Call on draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event- > > notifications-13 (a.k.a. "netconf-notif"): > > > > > > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event-notificat > > > ions-13 > > > > > > This, along with the restconf-notif Last Call, started in a separate > > > message, marks the last of the last calls on the yang push suite of > > > drafts. As explained before, given the size and number of documents, > > > the chairs decided to break the reviews up into pieces so as to get > > > focus on each in turn. We chose to go top-down, starting with > > > yang-push and ending with the "notif" drafts. We plan to submit the > > > drafts for publication when they are ready as a collective. > > > The goal is to do all this prior to IETF 103. > > > > > > While it's always nice to receive messages of support, at this time, > > > the question isn't so much if the working group supports the work than > > > if the document is ready to progress. The chairs need to see reviews > > > that indicate thorough end-to-end reading of the text. Of course, if > > > there are any objections, these should be brought forward now as well. > > > > > > The current version (-13) of this draft was published on Oct 4th > > > (today). The datatracker page for the draft is here: > > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-netconf-event- > > notifications. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Kent (and Mahesh) > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Netconf mailing list > > > Netconf@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > > > > > -- > > Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. > > Senior Specialist > > Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > Netconf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf >
- [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications-13 Kent Watsen
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Balázs Lengyel
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Tianran Zhou
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Netconf] WGLC on netconf-event-notifications… Eric Voit (evoit)