Re: [netmod] OpsState and Schema-Mount

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 09:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D81312D733 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZvycgdTnVKJh for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA6012D67B for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 02:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1290; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470214935; x=1471424535; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XJPV8iKrSCZ0N1Is7GTayJIB8WY9jRW1cvCl5zcOniQ=; b=DE2H+eOC6Hl3zSfongG+TeK+3Q2qLc7PLq/AqtnJwtY6kXiZ7SxahOZW 22qjScxFncpnKv/q1UFUXfAbwYJvTKbB9w6NtEl8lQnn2lg2h8bqYvC9+ RiBjJDWSWMIL0Hz+XtC43N7wDRV5uYZydVERdK5waPAp/kZyIx6Qn3DsO 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BxCgD3saFX/xbLJq1dhEVSuyuGHQKCAhABAQEBAQEBXSeEXgEBBAE4QRALGC5XBgEMBgIBARWIEAi/GQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR+GKoF4glWEEhEBhXcBBJk0jn+JU4VsiGiDSIN3NR+DezsyhyaBNgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,465,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="638253311"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Aug 2016 09:02:13 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.91] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-91.cisco.com [10.63.23.91]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u7392D09000302; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 09:02:13 GMT
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
References: <bed9398c-0e6a-450e-d2ac-b381b6bebf87@cisco.com> <5296754B-8178-4B1B-B4A6-FE228ABB8E7F@juniper.net> <9367f4b1-7814-e175-32e8-d518438b841d@cisco.com> <m24m79c1ja.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <D3BF8708.72620%acee@cisco.com> <552008CB-F216-4578-A709-AE0613C2EFB9@nic.cz> <12ed1a4d-44c5-9a51-b6d4-95e1620a24ee@cisco.com> <m260roedim.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <CABCOCHRF98sTa=MA1VTkZovOufL-=yQr9Gzy+ojnncjSfK1y0Q@mail.gmail.com> <e307c2fc-e621-b5c6-4fcc-67bbcdcb87b9@cisco.com> <20160729163220.GA3579@elstar.local> <68421198-703c-bb26-0fcc-f560e6fe108d@ericsson.com> <100B5D71-C23E-4C72-9EA2-2DB6574DEB87@nic.cz>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5153eab1-8d87-6e3c-3b54-441f683695e4@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:02:14 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <100B5D71-C23E-4C72-9EA2-2DB6574DEB87@nic.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/6a6TuDa43urk7088TQzaT-YvJAE>
Cc: netmod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] OpsState and Schema-Mount
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 09:02:17 -0000


On 03/08/2016 07:49, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> On 02 Aug 2016, at 18:35, Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> If we allow foo and foo-state for opstate, mounting models atop such a multi rooted yang module will be fun.
>> mount modB-config-part onto modA-config-part
>> mount modB-state-part onto modA-state-part
>> One mount becomes two and you have to maintain parallel mounts otherwise you are mounting half modules.
> This is already happenning with augments. It means some work but nothing terribly complex.
>
>> Actually the problem is not caused by opstate, but rather by multi-rooted models. but avoiding foo-state would make life easier once more.
> We already agreed that some items (such as RIBs) are "true" state which don't have direct counterparts in configuration. If we don't have foo-state, where are these supposed to be placed?
One choice is that they could just be placed under foo, where foo is a 
config false leaf.

Rob


>
> Lada
>
>> regards Balazs
>>
>> -- 
>> Balazs Lengyel                       Ericsson Hungary Ltd.
>> Senior Specialist
>> Mobile: +36-70-330-7909              email: Balazs.Lengyel@ericsson.com
>>
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>
>
>
>
> .
>