Re: [netmod] OpsState and Schema-Mount

[Robert Wilton <[e-mail]>]

Hi Balazs,

Yes, it would be exactly as you describe: you end up having two parallel 
trees, with two parallel sets of mount points.

It feels like this would be an extra wart, but not the end of the world.

I also agree that avoiding the foo/foo-state split would help mitigate this.

Thanks,
Rob


On 02/08/2016 17:35, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello,
> If we allow foo and foo-state for opstate, mounting models atop such a 
> multi rooted yang module will be fun.
> mount modB-config-part onto modA-config-part
> mount modB-state-part onto modA-state-part
> One mount becomes two and you have to maintain parallel mounts 
> otherwise you are mounting half modules.
>
> Actually the problem is not caused by opstate, but rather by 
> multi-rooted models. but avoiding foo-state would make life easier 
> once more.
>
> regards Balazs
>