Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02

Lou Berger <> Fri, 22 March 2019 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076791314C7 for <>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2pc_0bYHVLKE for <>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FADC1314CC for <>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4854A175C2E for <>; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:07:44 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ([]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 7PW3hhy55XFO57PW3hOBZi; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:07:44 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc: References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NmFVa2MJxqTrFu3G0errPKM4cuXo05a7+yXbzfPotd4=; b=zS7WLBPSq3hT9nQU7Y78T7J555 0oal0+2t96AHGAlszFwu9NqZmhmsGYzQ5bFD92pflX9FZqoiaaiFw3ChKMeL+A55aGUPLxi51hWLK BKsHYnVQKiAaO5MCQZhQdPZ+h;
Received: from ([]:36160 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <>) id 1h7PW3-003HYW-7p; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 13:07:43 -0600
References: <>
Cc: Kent Watsen <>, "" <>
From: Lou Berger <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 15:07:39 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DC8779A5CF9FD61E823ED321"
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1h7PW3-003HYW-7p
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) []:36160
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] adoption poll for yang-versioning-reqs-02
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:07:50 -0000


Thank you all for the good input on this thread.

With the understanding that a 00 working group document is a starting 
point for the working group rather than a document that is ready for 
last call - we believe there is sufficient support to adopt this 
document as a starting point for the requirements we wish to address on 
this topic.

It is clear that there is still work to be done on this document before 
we can declare consensus on it and, not surprisingly, that there is more 
work to be done on the solution.


Please resubmit this document as draft-ietf-netmod-yang-revision-reqs-00 
with the only change being the name and publication date.  The -01 
version should focus on resolving issues raised during adoption.  Of 
course the document is subject to normal WG input and processing.

Please note the 'file' name change -this is to indicate that the 
requirements are not presupposing a specific solution. It is also 
consistent with how versioning is defined within the document currently.

Note: we would like to try to continue the list discussion in next 
week's session and ask the Authors/DT to summarize issues raised during 
the adoption call and lead a discussion to help resolve these issues.

Thank you,

Lou (and Kent and Joel)

On 3/13/2019 4:22 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Seeing as how we all need to read this draft anyways, in preparation 
> for our meeting in Prague, it seems like a good time for this poll. 
>  Thusly, this email begins a 1-week adoption poll for:
> Please voice your support or objections before March 20.
> Note that this draft defines *requirements* and its intended status is 
> "Informational."   I believe that it is good for WGs to formalize 
> requirements, even taking such drafts thru Last Call, in order to 
> ensure consensus on the requirements.  This is the "adoption" call, to 
> ascertain if the WG agrees with that statement; if adopted, a separate 
> "last call" will be issued to ensure to correctness of the draft's 
> content.
> Kent (and Lou and Joel)
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list