IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 27 August 2015 11:27 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA0F1A872E for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6uNTQ1ZTmUS for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.38.55]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7440C1A8AF9 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 04:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28181 invoked by uid 0); 27 Aug 2015 11:27:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2015 11:27:54 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 9nTn1r00N2SSUrH01nTqxV; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:27:53 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=EbVbHpWC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=4g2epv4a4k0A:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=uRRa74qj2VoA:10 a=M5kpELkfPMM3tnWEtvsA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=IGX-_eAHJBQA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=kgxhwXw9KxwvhrTh4NwR/g4k/950CKOyWIaJ8mT4eBc=; b=BD0vCZk3ONNFvGh63LdXAjEIl7omwjzR0ftQiaQ0bk7k0/v7R9uAzAoSvspQINcVP5Sn+yN6tiQnEJBIgaiIZLgn9B8gLmSIsXFNnyGckuBIkygfFvIH+MGShYE8v/v5;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:34831 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZUvLP-0007LS-FQ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:27:48 -0600
Message-ID: <55DEF430.40801@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:27:44 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <55D36473.90609@cisco.com> <CABCOCHRP3omx37XmEJfPwg6eELuSKF=YL8pgpnvLh9PQxgV62A@mail.gmail.com> <55D45CAF.2070605@cisco.com> <20150819.132555.871710491924929960.mbj@tail-f.com> <013601d0da9b$907f6b00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20150823170415.GA77197@elstar.local> <012901d0e01e$12c22b20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20150827064240.GB87367@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20150827064240.GB87367@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/I1f1IK5zfDHK_k53I6lSPb2PJwg>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:27:59 -0000

On 08/27/2015 02:42 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> The flat sea of YANG modules brings a different set of issues and I
>> > am unsure what they are;
>
> This is main problem I have. What the heck is the problem we are trying
> to fix?
> 

The first, but not only problem, is today's ~200 top level models
(looking at current RFCs and I-Ds) with little apparent organization or
inter-relationship.

Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email