IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 27 August 2015 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BF01B2D7B for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CI5Rrv22PXXs for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 927D31B2D67 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 19057 invoked by uid 0); 27 Aug 2015 13:00:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 27 Aug 2015 13:00:06 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by CMOut01 with id 9ozo1r00V2SSUrH01ozrUE; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 07:00:05 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=EbVbHpWC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=6PzwTDcoQqoA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=uRRa74qj2VoA:10 a=hljkz9boUe-SrVCC4JEA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject; bh=pevA5Bkt7c1KfD8YqPvv6g2bU9ezkNqDT9bcs3xkfz4=; b=gPP5YTK+S61k9TNA5xYuu8ECTP8dhDf69DY3DbXNCRGw9xfdxsVRUz/LnEP1HSsvEjG/PR5+73lSojjrTsjhXNqKhN+FSTuHBC0x7FyHJRKm5m3IPn/WB2ssrk08PucD;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:41771 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1ZUwmT-0001Nj-BA; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 06:59:49 -0600
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>, "t. petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <55D36473.90609@cisco.com> <CABCOCHRP3omx37XmEJfPwg6eELuSKF=YL8pgpnvLh9PQxgV62A@mail.gmail.com> <55D45CAF.2070605@cisco.com> <20150819.132555.871710491924929960.mbj@tail-f.com> <013601d0da9b$907f6b00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20150823170415.GA77197@elstar.local> <012901d0e01e$12c22b20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20150827064240.GB87367@elstar.local> <CABCOCHQYhUp95AmfSvkF8YF3uUUF4swhU8542o9F-5qHBa7sog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55DF09C0.2020708@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:59:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABCOCHQYhUp95AmfSvkF8YF3uUUF4swhU8542o9F-5qHBa7sog@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/W5hKYRMPsyz31BqL1E4fsdbZMIM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:00:19 -0000


On 8/27/2015 8:23 AM, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
> I don't see the 6 modules that have already been published so far in RFCs
> as the problem.  I suggest focusing on the 194 modules that have not
> been published.

100% agree
>   Should the IETF spend a year or two debating the ONE TRUE
> PERFECT uber-tree? 6 months?
No, IMO we should take a stab at it and go with our best understanding
and consensus -- that is after all what the I*E*TF is all about.

> How long will it take for all interested
> vendors to agree where every little thing goes, before starting on any
> of it.
>

The DT's proposal seems to be a consensus starting point (from my DT and
individual perspective, based on *many* discussions with vendors and
users) in at least the routing area.  Outside the routing area, I've
heard three or four individual objections.  Not saying we have it right,
but just that we have a solid start.

Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email