Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node

Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 19 August 2015 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC82C1A8758 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u4NlPHn2Gchr for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7896E1A874F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 07:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1216; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1439995160; x=1441204760; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hmk6n1R+xOxqxNz/Qg83SBbvp66pwbBdMqGBadGwMW0=; b=lYKnmzqRkujc0CxisGHj04v9p4CVTd2RBiDeZrHtwmadzOVJVH/PCcD7 icPrPRkrSiJQzSJKSk2rd2iboe4HF5zz/NRK0Uv1ryZRPQed5RGG33khl iAgWOebu7RjESS1/ewMkEQwnd/4yjqctQXOVuuHk3a9BQPZ07S6ALtfJn 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CbBABclNRV/xbLJq1dhFjFRgKCDAEBAQEBAYELhCQBAQQ4QAEQCw4KCRYPCQMCAQIBRQYNBgIBAYgq0QsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARuLU4UKB4QsAQSMYIhEjG2IbpFDJoN+PTOCTAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,710,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="606458927"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Aug 2015 14:39:18 +0000
Received: from [10.63.23.86] (dhcp-ensft1-uk-vla370-10-63-23-86.cisco.com [10.63.23.86]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7JEdIDg028702; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:39:18 GMT
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <55D36473.90609@cisco.com> <CABCOCHRP3omx37XmEJfPwg6eELuSKF=YL8pgpnvLh9PQxgV62A@mail.gmail.com> <55D45CAF.2070605@cisco.com> <20150819.132555.871710491924929960.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <55D49515.2010906@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:39:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150819.132555.871710491924929960.mbj@tail-f.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/JjWOP04KuIroQTYYa2C8qgkHCeI>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 14:39:22 -0000


On 19/08/2015 12:25, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> What would the real resource location for
>> "/network/device/<device-name>/interfaces/interface" be?
> I don't think there is such a thing as a "real" location.  The path is
> scoped in the system you work with; in the controller it might be as I
> illustrated above, in the device it starts with /interfaces, but in a
> controller-of-controllers it might be:
>
>    /domains/domain[name='bar']/devices/device[name='foo']/data
>      /interfaces/interface[name='eth0']
>
> Currently we have a proprietary way of "relocating" YANG modules, and
> ODL has its "mount", and I think Andy has some other mechanism.  Maybe
> the time has come to standardize how mount works, and maybe then also
> standardize the list of devices in a controller model.
Yes, I agree.

I was also questioning whether relocating YANG modules is something that 
YANG packages could/should be concerned with.

There is also draft-clemm-netmod-mount-00 which seems to be concerned 
with mounting external datastores in part of the data tree that may also 
be worth considering.

Thanks,
Rob


>
>
> /martin
> .
>