Re: [netmod] Y34

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Mon, 20 July 2015 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEDA1A87CC for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SyfQyOFkufGN for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30AD81A87B2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 05:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:ffff:13:3999:35fe:238f:9582] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:ffff:13:3999:35fe:238f:9582]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC0B3181413 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:48:04 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1437396484; bh=gGGTxrKH5BDRSkF5/nfH1aFcmwTWX10qWM5XrOpFyCY=; h=From:Date:To; b=ToMa+cpQTg9eWiuXQmc7G+D9Ue+wXviGTn0mGYQYbr50QWJLJOAIkKT4eaoNspeoW Aa14NZZQaHffdKrsiDEeXqfP6ul0Zk+Yrkho4xh76QWoTPGixURFfLt2BCC78CNz0d Da/Hl2/atXiP3ID3Cr0Hic64RSHN2TXcCBxLALT0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <m2d1zn0zhm.fsf@dhcp-hotel-wired-13-fe.meeting.ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:48:04 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D0153452-D5F5-4E3C-B3D7-7003ACC405EA@nic.cz>
References: <m2d1zn0zhm.fsf@dhcp-hotel-wired-13-fe.meeting.ietf.org>
To: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/VR5a2oX7vCLH43IT5yvLIc-3pGo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Y34
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:48:42 -0000

> On 20 Jul 2015, at 14:45, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> after listening to the presentation of
> draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-00 at RTGWG session, I am wondering
> whether the solution chosen for Y34 is really useful.
> 
> The draft states they want to reuse ietf-interfaces but their tree in
> fact is
> 
>   +--rw device
>          +--rw info
>          |  +--rw device-type?   enumeration
>          +--rw hardware
>          +--rw interfaces
>          |  +--rw interface* [name]
>          |     ...
>          +--rw qos
> 
> So the "interfaces" container is no more a top-level node. There are
> three possible options:
> 
> 1. Change the ietf-interfaces module.
> 2. Replicate its contents in another module.
> 3. Extend YANG so that a *specific* schema tree can be grafted at a
>   given data node.
> 
> IMO #1 & #2 are really bad. I thought Y34-04 was essentially #3 but it
> seems it is not so because it doesn't specify a concrete data model
> that's allowed at a given location.
> 
> On the other hand, the only real contribution of "anydata" over "anyxml"
> is that is doesn't permit mixed content in XML, which is IMO not much.
> 
> I know Y34 was already closed but I think it is more important to do
> things right before YANG 1.1 becomes an RFC.
> 
> What I want to propose is this:
> 
> - Rename "anydata" as a synonym to "anyxml", and deprecate "anyxml" (but
>  keep it for backward compatibility).

s/Rename/Introduce/

> 
> - Introduce a new statement and data node type, e.g. "root", that will
>  extend the schema tree starting from that data node with a precisely
>  specified data model. The specification can be same or similar as
>  in yang-library.
> 
> I believe there are other use cases in the existing modules. For
> example, the ietf-routing module could simply define the data model for
> a single routing instance (i.e. without "routing-instance" list at the
> top), and it can be then used without changes on simple devices, and
> more complex router implementations can graft it as a subtree under
> "routing-instance", "networking-instance" or whatever.
> 
> Lada
> 
> -- 
> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C