Re: [netmod] Inventory YANG model (entity-MIB)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 06 March 2015 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D20A1A0636 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:08:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmqNUp4VQNUl for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:08:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAF9F1A1DBE for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:08:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1167; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425650934; x=1426860534; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MgXhbM869o3y5HA28vjH+HoObFbAQkUkoLGQ0lWmwLo=; b=UiccHi1/BxDsicon+A0FOfBKvmo9jcuxzmIRCstpTfSP3x3dmtABvz5R JqBFatQ/YLEUxykhPpsFTBPFgz1n25KNeNg6ol5WWdCBcctJxwxBZXskg lYTcQiXlVrkIBsGgZHvZki+altokvuswirXoCid0mYFpbj4kWp/P+cAEy 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DyBACds/lU/xbLJq1cwBiEMYc3AoFzEgEBAQEBAQF8hBABAQQyAQVAEQsOCgkWDwkDAgECAUUGAQwIAQGIK81WAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEcixKELEmEKwEEmTuGaoxrI4NvPYE1gT8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,353,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="367541199"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2015 14:08:51 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.85] (ams-bclaise-8914.cisco.com [10.60.67.85]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t26E8oR7019959; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:08:51 GMT
Message-ID: <54F9B4EF.1060702@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 15:08:47 +0100
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'NETMOD Working Group' <netmod@ietf.org>, draft-dong-i2rs-network-inventory@tools.ietf.org, i2rs-chairs@tools.ietf.org
References: <54F985E2.6020304@cisco.com> <20150306110536.GA73575@elstar.local> <0e7201d05804$2ef8dfc0$8cea9f40$@ndzh.com> <20150306133808.GB74093@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20150306133808.GB74093@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/SIwfxIfwrIJX5c0b1FhrreRfnc0>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Inventory YANG model (entity-MIB)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:08:56 -0000

Dear all,
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:53:37AM -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
>> As technical advisor, do you know if the Entity-MIB work scheduled for
>> upgrading to a yang module?
> No.
>
>> If not, is there a working group where we could suggest an
>> equivalent model.
> The NETMOD working group would likely be the first stop unless the
> IESG wants to proceed with a more targetted approach.
Let's make it clear for everybody.
NETMOD is the place where an ENTITY-MIB based YANG model must happen.
As Jürgen points it out below, the charter was modified for this type of 
work.

So we discussed the WHERE, the next question is WHO?

Regards, Benoit (AD hat on)
> The NETMOD
> charter says:
>
>     The NETMOD WG may also develop any additional data models written
>     in YANG that the WG considers core building blocks and that do not
>     fall under the charters of other active IETF working groups.
>
>> As to config true,  this Data model seems IMHO (jie may correct me) one of
>> the I2RS model that wants to have ephemeral state but also change things in
>> the data store.
> Ephemeral is kind of surprising for me.
>
> /js
>